Re: [PATCH] xfs: Print a warning if the filesystem needs to be repaired

2021-04-20 Thread Carlos Maiolino
> Suggested-by: Eric Sandeen > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas > --- > > grub-core/fs/xfs.c | 16 > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/grub-core/fs/xfs.c b/grub-core/fs/xfs.c > index 43023e03fb3..22e7e61d574 100644 > --- a/grub-core/fs/xfs.c > +++ b/grub

Re: [PATCH] xfs: Print a warning if the filesystem needs to be repaired

2021-04-20 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 05:16:50PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > XFS now has an incompat feature flag to indicate that the filesystem needs > to be repaired. The Linux kernel refuses to mount a filesystem that has it > set and only the xfs_repair tool is able to clear that flag. > > One

Re: GRUB 2.06

2021-04-20 Thread Daniel Kiper
Hi Didier, On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 11:26:08PM +0200, Didier Spaier wrote: > Le 08/04/2021 à 21:28, Didier Spaier a écrit : > > I am fine with shipping GRUB up to some commit in Slint, but not all > > distributions accept to do that, or to carry a zillion patches as does > > Debian. > > > > As resu

Re: GRUB 2.06

2021-04-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hello! On 4/20/21 3:53 PM, Daniel Kiper wrote: > I tried a few times but I am not able to open this link. Sorry... > Could you explain your problem here? The correct link seems to point to this thread: > https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/requests-for-current-14-2-15-0-a-41756

Re: [PATCH 0/1] PRI* translation issues.

2021-04-20 Thread Daniel Kiper
Hey Miguel, On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 10:58:38AM +0200, Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas wrote: > Hi, > > Daniel Kiper writes: > > [...] > > Signed-off-by: Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas > > > > I can add this for you before committing the patch. > > That'd be great, thank you. > > >> I added a description of

Re: GRUB 2.06

2021-04-20 Thread Didier Spaier
Hi Daniel and John Paul Adrian, Le 20/04/2021 à 15:53, Daniel Kiper a écrit : > Hi Didier, > > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 11:26:08PM +0200, Didier Spaier wrote: >> Le 08/04/2021 à 21:28, Didier Spaier a écrit : >>> I am fine with shipping GRUB up to some commit in Slint, but not all >>> distribution

Re: GRUB 2.06

2021-04-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 4/20/21 7:34 PM, Didier Spaier wrote: > So, it's hard to understand for many end users that: > > 1. The issue appeared after gcc-10 began to be used, well after the release > of grub 2.04. > 2. It has been fixed long ago. > 3. But for the fix to be effective one of these conditions should be m

Re: GRUB 2.06

2021-04-20 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 1:34 PM Didier Spaier wrote: > So, it's hard to understand for many end users that: > > 1. The issue appeared after gcc-10 began to be used, well after the > release of grub 2.04. > 2. It has been fixed long ago. > 3. But for the fix to be effective one of these conditions

Re: GRUB 2.06

2021-04-20 Thread Bruce Dubbs
On 4/20/21 12:50 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 1:34 PM Didier Spaier wrote: So, it's hard to understand for many end users that: 1. The issue appeared after gcc-10 began to be used, well after the release of grub 2.04. 2. It has been fixed long ago. 3. But for the fix to be e

Re: GRUB 2.06

2021-04-20 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:21 PM Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > On 4/20/21 12:50 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 1:34 PM Didier Spaier wrote: > >> So, it's hard to understand for many end users that: > >> > >> 1. The issue appeared after gcc-10 began to be used, well after the > >> rel

Re: GRUB 2.06

2021-04-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 4/20/21 7:50 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > My 2 cents: > > If a distro starts shipping a new version of GCC, they should really > test their packages first and patch them as needed. > > If an end user installs a new version of GCC manually, I would hope > they are smart enough to know that it migh

Re: GRUB 2.06

2021-04-20 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 4/8/21 3:28 PM, Didier Spaier wrote: > I am fine with shipping GRUB up to some commit in Slint, but not all > distributions accept to do that, or to carry a zillion patches as does > Debian. > > As result, end users complain "GRUB is broken" whereas a patch that fix the > issue of which they s

Re: GRUB 2.06

2021-04-20 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 4/20/21 1:48 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > I think it's reasonable to expect from a distribution that they > backport upstream fixes, at least in Debian, openSUSE and Fedora, it > isn't a problem. I think it is unreasonable -- backporting upstream fixes is a sign that upstream software

Re: GRUB 2.06

2021-04-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 4/20/21 10:33 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > (Well, I'm given to understand Debian maintainers seem to actively enjoy > having many patches. So I guess I shouldn't be *too* surprised that a > Debian Developer is insisting that people maintain downstream patches.) Why do you think you need to resort t