Bruce Edge wrote:
I actually had the kernel arg=val repeated twice originally, but the
xen-devel guys said to use dummy=dummy.
Maybe the xen-devel guys meant the following grub command:
multiboot /boot/xen.gz dummy=dummy [other options]
which will pass to xen the following multiboot-protocol
Hi,
The processing of option `-o' in grub-mkconfig only works when
it is the first option. The code is:
# Check the arguments.
for option in "$@"; do
case "$option" in
[...]
-o)
shift
grub_cfg=$1
;;
--output=*)
grub_cfg=`echo "$option" | sed 's/--outp
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:08:48PM +0200, Grégoire Sutre wrote:
> The processing of option `-o' in grub-mkconfig only works when
> it is the first option. The code is:
>
> # Check the arguments.
> for option in "$@"; do
> case "$option" in
> [...]
> -o)
> shift
> grub_cfg=$1
>
On 05/21/2010 12:57 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
Thanks for the patch, it works fine. I'm just wondering: Is keeping
`-o' worth the extra complication?
Grégoire
How about:
=== modified file 'util/grub-mkconfig.in'
--- util/grub-mkconfig.in 2010-04-19 19:25:41 +
+++ util/grub-mkconfig.in
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 02:19:36PM +0200, Grégoire Sutre wrote:
> Thanks for the patch, it works fine. I'm just wondering: Is keeping
> `-o' worth the extra complication?
I think so. It's probably stuck in a number of people's heads by now.
If we want to simplify things, we should use something
2010/5/20 Grégoire Sutre
>
> Bruce Edge wrote:
>
>> I actually had the kernel arg=val repeated twice originally, but the
>> xen-devel guys said to use dummy=dummy.
>
> Maybe the xen-devel guys meant the following grub command:
>
> multiboot /boot/xen.gz dummy=dummy [other options]
>
> which will
Fixed
KESHAV P.R. wrote:
> Compiling grub2 for x86_64-UEFI
>
> ./configure --with-platform=efi --target=x86_64
> --program-transform-name=s,grub,grub2, --enable-efiemu
> --enable-mm-debug --enable-grub-fstest --enable-grub-mkfont
> --disable-nls --prefix=/grub2_efi_x64
>
> and i386-BIOS
>
> ./confi
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 02:19:36PM +0200, Grégoire Sutre wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the patch, it works fine. I'm just wondering: Is keeping
>> `-o' worth the extra complication?
>>
>
> I think so. It's probably stuck in a number of people's heads by now.
>
> If we want
Hi Vladimir,
I have some news - I made extensive testing and researching and I
discovered some things related to OHCI and generally to USB MS or USB
itself.
I tried to fix them and it looks like I was probably successful in some
cases:
- multiple LUNs related bug (meaning of value from device &
On 05/22/2010 01:46 AM, Aleš Nesrsta wrote:
I cannot get actual bzr code because of this error:
$ bzr get http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/grub
bzr: ERROR: Not a branch:
"http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/grub/.bzr/branch/";.
For trunk, use:
bzr branch http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/grub/trunk/grub
10 matches
Mail list logo