Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 02:19:36PM +0200, Grégoire Sutre wrote: > >> Thanks for the patch, it works fine. I'm just wondering: Is keeping >> `-o' worth the extra complication? >> > > I think so. It's probably stuck in a number of people's heads by now. > > If we want to simplify things, we should use something like getopt(1) as > I think I proposed a while back, although that's not entirely without > its problems. What are the problems with getopt? Cross-vendor compatibility? Can it be alleviated the gnulib way? > TBH I don't think the complication here is a big deal; > it's just one option and it doesn't change often. > >
-- Regards Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
