Please use proper quoting. It doestn't make it easier to read if your
answer is directly below my sentences without any special quoting.
Am Sonntag, den 03.01.2010, 20:29 -0800 schrieb Lapohos Tibor:
>
> Thanks for your help. Please see my further questions below.
>
> Based on your input, I ca
Robert Millan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've removed loader/efi/appleloader.c, because it contained blobs of
> binary data. If someone can provide a satisfactory explanation for
> them, it can be added back. However, this command seems to be seldom
> needed.
>
> Please keep in mind binary blobs or other k
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've removed loader/efi/appleloader.c, because it contained blobs of
>> binary data. If someone can provide a satisfactory explanation for
>> them, it can be added back. However, this command seems to be seldom
Hello. Currently mbi contains a lot of pointers and substructures. It's
has various problems like:
-Unused fields occupy space if any subsequent fields is used.
-Difficult to relocate since it may be spilled all over the memory
-It's unstraightforward to e.g. specify 2 framebuffers
I propose to use
Robert Millan wrote:
>
>> +.long 0
>> +.long 1024
>> +.long 768
>> +.long 32
>>
>
> Maybe better to use 640x480 instead? Not everyone has a large display.
>
>
It's only a recommended resolution. Bootloader will use a mode it
chooses. Perhaps we should remove recommended
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Isaac Dupree
wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>>>
>>> In this case color_info is defined as following:
>>
>> I'd appreciate if a native English speaker confirms this, but I believe
>> this should say "as follows" (same for the other instances of this
>> construct).
>
I've been working on grub.texi and I notice a reference to
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/grub-faq.html. I will change that to
grub-2-faq.en.html before I submit it.
I think we should come up with a new list of FAQs here and agree on the
answers. I'll be glad to format it.
The current que
