On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:09:02PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>
> My main concern is the size of the files we install in /boot/grub. It's
> approaching one megabyte already,
We don't need to do that just because of OFW. I think the approach of
installing /boot/grub/ to that tiny filesystem is j
Btw, what is MVC anyway? :-)
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
__
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 04:51:11PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>
> I'd like to avoid preprocessor conditionals in kern/ARCH/dl.c files if
> possible.
Alright, here's a new patch. It follows your earlier suggestion to use
a wrapper to obtain the initialization address for symtab. This way we
don'
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 16:31 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Btw, what is MVC anyway? :-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model-view-controller
It's a popular design pattern in designing business applications, which
discourages hardcoding the rules (business logic) into the data
structures and the user
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 14:47 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:09:02PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> >
> > My main concern is the size of the files we install in /boot/grub. It's
> > approaching one megabyte already,
>
> We don't need to do that just because of OFW. I think
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 12:38 +0800, Hongyi Zhao wrote:
> FYI, could someone please give me some hints on the maillist/newsgroup
> aimed for grub4dos?
Hint: search for grub4dos on google.com.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-d
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 16:41 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 04:51:11PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to avoid preprocessor conditionals in kern/ARCH/dl.c files if
> > possible.
>
> Alright, here's a new patch. It follows your earlier suggestion to use
> a wrap
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:44:07PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 16:41 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 04:51:11PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd like to avoid preprocessor conditionals in kern/ARCH/dl.c files if
> > > possible.
> >
> > Alri
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:42:29AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 12:38 +0800, Hongyi Zhao wrote:
>
> > FYI, could someone please give me some hints on the maillist/newsgroup
> > aimed for grub4dos?
GRUB 2 works well at chainloading from NTLDR, it's just not documented.
Perha
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 19:03 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 03-simple-symtab.patch looks nice, much cleaner than what I had.
Thanks!
> But as for 02-elf-renames.patch we could try to make this more consistent. In
> efiemu I used 'W' (inspired by ElfW() macro in glibc), then in some places you
> u
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 01:16:57PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > But as for 02-elf-renames.patch we could try to make this more consistent.
> > In
> > efiemu I used 'W' (inspired by ElfW() macro in glibc), then in some places
> > you
> > use 'K' and in other places 'T'. Can we use the same eve
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 19:43 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Ok, I don't mind. Unless you have any objections, I'll merge your two
> patches with mine and commit that.
Please let me try to do it in a nicer way.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
___
Grub-devel
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 19:43 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 01:16:57PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > > But as for 02-elf-renames.patch we could try to make this more
> > > consistent. In
> > > efiemu I used 'W' (inspired by ElfW() macro in glibc), then in some
> > > places
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 11:13 +0800, Bean wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > While at that, it would be nice to use a special notation for the
> > partial dependencies.
> >
> > Something like:
> >
> > aa:+ aa.o
> > aa:+ bb.o
>
> Hi,
>
> Is this new syntax for GNU mak
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 21:08 -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> The article states:
> > With respect to the technical qualities of GRUB 2, Rintel is mostly
> > impressed about GRUB 2's modular architecture. He calls other features such
> > as the graphics subsystem with mouse support capable of render
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 00:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 06:10:36PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 17:27 +0800, Bean wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Some bug fix for osdetect.lua, it also detect windows 98/me, freedos,
> > > msdos and freebsd.
> >
> > W
Hi,
On Jun/26/2009, Robert Millan wrote:
> Also, if *.mo files contain plain text, compression would work well on
> them. They could be gzipped.
Yes, they contain plain text.
I implemented gettext without the hashtable (the .mo files usually has a
hashtable for the search). We will not have l
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 00:39 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > "root hd0,3" has not effect. "root (hd0,3)" and "root=hd0,3" work.
> > Yes, that's a bug in the root command.
> Can't root command be ditched altogether? It sounds l
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 06:26:57PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> --- a/include/grub/elf.h
> +++ b/include/grub/elf.h
> @@ -2330,4 +2330,48 @@ typedef Elf32_Addr Elf32_Conflict;
>
> #define R_X86_64_NUM 24
>
> +#ifndef DEFAULT_ELF_BITS
> +#define DEFAULT_ELF_BITS (8 * GRUB_TARGET_SIZEOF_
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 06:34:00PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 21:08 -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
>
> > The article states:
> > > With respect to the technical qualities of GRUB 2, Rintel is mostly
> > > impressed about GRUB 2's modular architecture. He calls other features
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 12:41 +0800, Bean wrote:
> Oh, fixed typos now. As for "Windows Vista bootmgr" and "Windows
> NT/2000/XP loader", I just copy them from 10_windows.in, I guess there
> is a reason for it there.
I don't think so.
> > inird should be initrd. Please add check for the Fedora s
On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 01:57 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 06:26:57PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > --- a/include/grub/elf.h
> > +++ b/include/grub/elf.h
> > @@ -2330,4 +2330,48 @@ typedef Elf32_Addr Elf32_Conflict;
> >
> > #define R_X86_64_NUM 24
> >
> >
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 11:13 +0800, Bean wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>
>> > While at that, it would be nice to use a special notation for the
>> > partial dependencies.
>> >
>> > Something like:
>> >
>> > aa:+
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 12:41 +0800, Bean wrote:
>
>> Oh, fixed typos now. As for "Windows Vista bootmgr" and "Windows
>> NT/2000/XP loader", I just copy them from 10_windows.in, I guess there
>> is a reason for it there.
>
> I don't think so.
On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 11:44 +0800, Bean wrote:
> Oh, actually aa: aa.o is already a ruby generated rule, it doesn't
> exist in rmk file. The original line from rmk would be something like
> this:
>
> aa_SOURCES += aa.c
I see. Sorry for the noise.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
___
On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 11:53 +0800, Bean wrote:
> Yes, actually it's just a bunch of file_exist AND or OR together, but
> I think if we use this kind of test often enough, implement it in c
> would be more efficient.
So far, we only have one file.
I checked the Lua reference manual, and no file r
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 11:53 +0800, Bean wrote:
>
>> Yes, actually it's just a bunch of file_exist AND or OR together, but
>> I think if we use this kind of test often enough, implement it in c
>> would be more efficient.
>
> So far, we only ha
27 matches
Mail list logo
