On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 11:13 +0800, Bean wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Pavel Roskin<pro...@gnu.org> wrote:
> > While at that, it would be nice to use a special notation for the > > partial dependencies. > > > > Something like: > > > > aa:+ aa.o > > aa:+ bb.o > > Hi, > > Is this new syntax for GNU make ? My version report error when using :+ . No. I suggested syntax that would indicate that it's not a complete make rule. If we use Ruby to join the rules, we can replace ":+" with ":" in the result. > > Please don't use "_DEFINED" to mean "rule emitted", it's confusing. > > How about _RULES_DEFINED ? I'm fine with anything that is descriptive. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
