Am Montag, den 13.04.2009, 21:11 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> How about [__FreeBSD__ || __FreeBSD_kernel__] ?
Ok.
> > + if (sysctlbyname ("kern.geom.debugflags", &sysctl_oldflags,
> > &sysctl_size, NULL, 0))
> > +grub_util_error ("cannot get current flags of sysctl
> > kern.geom.debugfl
Am Montag, den 13.04.2009, 21:03 -0400 schrieb John Stanley:
> Hi all,
> I was wondering what the current status of a grub2 port of the grub-0.97
> "map" and "rootnoverify" commands is? I have found some work done to
> this end in the "drivemap.patch" work, but I find nothing more recent
> than
What's the advantage of booting with an mfsroot?
Also, will it be advantageous to me?
(FreeBSD installations contained within a UFS, UFS2 &/or ZFS logical partition)
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Joey Korkames wrote:
> That did the trick - amd64 boots with a mfsroot now. thanks!
>
> -joey
>
An update: I looked at the change between r2077 and r2104 and it looks
like the relevant code is util/hostdisk.c; I've attached a patch that
appears to fix the problem.
John
Hi Again,
Thanks, r2104 builds with --enable-grub-fstest now, but a new problem,
not present in r2101 has surfaced:
Awesome.
BTW: How do these update to GRUB2 work, I mean to the patches, once
proven automatically get integrated into GRUB2 (and released to the
official website)?
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 11.04.2009, 23:52 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
Thanks Felix,
Hurm.. Well, if anyone is interested, I have just made a couple of
additional updates to the drivemap.path.8 code,
and now with r2104 the "unaligned pointer" issue is gone, and it is
working great on my systems. I can post the patch if you or anyone else
is interested.
John
Fe
Hi Uzer Cheg.
Any progress on the Xserve?
On Mar 18, 2009, at 6:22 AM, uzer cheg wrote:
Dear all,
I'm trying to run Xen Dom0 kernel on my Xserve.
As I see I need Grub's entry like this:
menuentry "Xen 3.3 unstable -i386
{
search --set /boot/xen-3.3.gz
multiboot /boot/xen-3.3.gz
module
Hi Peter Cros,
If you need anyone to run tests on the Xserve, I have a score of
machines that we want to use on Linux...
On Apr 9, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Peter Cros wrote:
Hi,
It will be good to get this resolved and on SVN grub2 so people
(ubuntuforums) can build for Apple efi with the latest
Hello,
On Apr/11/2009, phcoder wrote:
> Hello, thanks for your work. It's a nice stuff, however it has some
> minor problems
During last months I have been extremely busy :-( and I think that I
will be during some more weeks, that's the reason that I have not been
following up :-(
I will catc
I haven't yet looked in depth in drivemap patch but it has some
problems. It uses preboot hook interface for which I proposed an update
in my recent patch "preboot hooks". Also it doesn't update memorymap
correctly. For this it should use my "mmap services" interface
John Stanley wrote:
Thanks
From: John Stanley
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:17:44 -0400
> An update: I looked at the change between r2077 and r2104 and it looks
> like the relevant code is util/hostdisk.c; I've attached a patch that
> appears to fix the problem.
Sorry about that bug.
I did test that patch, I wonder why it wo
Hi,
SVN rev 2074 should be good for Xserve1,1 and 1,2 according to tests we ran
at ubuntu forums.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Drew Rosen wrote:
> Hi Peter Cros,
>
> If you need anyone to run tests on the Xserve, I have a score of machines
> that we want to use on Linux...
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 9
From: David Miller
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
> From: John Stanley
> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:17:44 -0400
>
>> An update: I looked at the change between r2077 and r2104 and it looks
>> like the relevant code is util/hostdisk.c; I've attached a patch that
>> appears to fix the
I posted binaries from grub2 rev 2074 with all modules, for further
evaluation -
http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=7061606&postcount=595
(post #595 grub2074.tar.gz )
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Peter Cros wrote:
> Hi,
> SVN rev 2074 should be good for Xserve1,1 and 1,2 according to t
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 01:47:49PM +0200, phcoder wrote:
> Hello, we all know how annoying are these autogenerated files. We could
> remove it. The main argument against it is that people will not be able
> to compile without installing a lot of developement tools. It changes
> nothing for th
On Monday 13 April 2009 02:19:07 phcoder wrote:
> What about this one?
- ChangeLog, loader.h and loader.c are not consistent. For example, loader.h
declares grub_loader_unregister_preboot_hook, but loader.c defines
grub_loader_remove_preboot.
- I don't understand how preboot_func and preboot_re
On Monday 13 April 2009 14:03:01 Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 18:07 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Pavel Roskin
> > Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:24:49 -0400
> >
> > > On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 08:29 -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> > >> If we could build with -Werror, then it wouldn't
On Monday 13 April 2009 18:46:12 phcoder wrote:
> Hello, here is a first proposition of a script for nightly builds. On
> IRC Yoshinori K. Okuji said that grub.enbug.org could be used to host
> these files. Can this server do the builds too? If not can someone setup
> build factory?
I will do when
On Monday 13 April 2009 23:00:37 Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:58:05PM +0200, phcoder wrote:
> > Ping. Is it ok for me to implement it this way?
>
> I'd really like it if Okuji could give his impression on this one, if
> possible.
I don't think I am the right one to ask, becaus
On Monday 13 April 2009 23:27:32 Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 10:31:44PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch integrate the LUA script engine to grub2.
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't have any opinion for or against using LUA, but note that we need
> approval from Marco or Okuji befo
On Monday 13 April 2009 23:30:42 Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 04:54:21PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 11:29 -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> > > phcoder wrote on Sunday 12 April 2009:
> > > > Hello, we all know how annoying are these autogenerated files. We
On Saturday 11 April 2009 21:07:51 Bean wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > On Saturday 11 April 2009 18:29:00 Bean wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> When symbol name is 8 or less, pe store it as short name, which is not
> >> necessary null-terminated.
> >
> > Oh, I did
On Saturday 11 April 2009 22:16:58 Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Quoting "Yoshinori K. Okuji" :
> > "test -n" should be avoided. Maybe this is not necessary nowadays, but my
> > old lesson was to use "test x$target_alias != x" instead for portability.
> > Well, "!=" was not very portable, either, maybe.
>
On Saturday 11 April 2009 23:49:03 Bean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch generate handler.lst using the register functions. In
> normal.mod, it reads handler.lst and register commands like:
>
> terminal_output.gfxterm
> ...
>
> It also rename static function get_line in normal/main.c to
> grub_file_getl
On Sunday 12 April 2009 00:11:45 phcoder wrote:
> Updated. Same changelog
>
> >> + {
> >> + update_val (grub_strcmp (args[*argn], args[*argn + 2]) == 0);
> >> + (*argn) += 3;
> >
> > I myself feel that these parentheses are redundant, but I don't know how
> > others think. For
Am Mittwoch, den 15.04.2009, 00:35 +0900 schrieb Yoshinori K. Okuji:
>
> Well, it was not only about ruby, but also about autoconf. Anyway, if someone
> updates the INSTALL file appropriately, I don't object.
>
Ok, I just removed configure,config.h.in,stamp-h.in,DISTLIST,conf/*.mk,
updated INS
Hi,
Oh nice, can you confirm that there is no license conflict in porting
code from lua ?
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Monday 13 April 2009 23:27:32 Robert Millan wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 10:31:44PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This patch int
Hi,
ok, committed.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Saturday 11 April 2009 21:07:51 Bean wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
>> > On Saturday 11 April 2009 18:29:00 Bean wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> When symbol name is 8 or less,
--
Regards
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
xnu.mod
Description: audio/mod
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
Sorry this was supposed to be personal email to step21. I would never
send a binary to a list
phcoder wrote:
--
Regards
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
Hi,
committed.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Saturday 11 April 2009 23:49:03 Bean wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch generate handler.lst using the register functions. In
>> normal.mod, it reads handler.lst and register commands like:
>>
>> terminal_output.gfxterm
What's the advantage of booting with an mfsroot?
You can make a minimal fbsd system in the mfsroot that is smart enough to
"init_chroot" from a SMB/NFS netmount, or from a cloop file stored a CD or
http-sever (cached to a tmpfs (ramdisk)). Mine also unionfs-mounts a tmpfs
to what ever root th
Hi,dear folks, unfortunately I have a tough working schedule last time.
It still not tested.
Hope to do it in a few weeks.
phcoder, I will report results.
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
For a number of weird reasons, I would find the ability to kexec into grub2
from a running linux system useful.
In looking at the current code out there, there seems to be two ways to make
grub2 able to support this:
1) Add a 32-bit load segment to boot/i386/pc/lnxboot.S as described by
http
Hi
Great news!
Thanks for your reply!
Can't wait for PHcoder to finish his work!
Panarchy
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 5:17 AM, Joey Korkames wrote:
>> What's the advantage of booting with an mfsroot?
>
> You can make a minimal fbsd system in the mfsroot that is smart enough to
> "init_chroot" fro
You can checkout the code via:
svn co svn://svn.savannah.gnu.org/grub/trunk/grub2
Then use the autocompile.sh
script that was posted earlier to make builds of grub2 or
you can wait for the nightly autobuilder to be set-up and just download its
results (from wherever they will be announced).
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 00:45 +0900, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Saturday 11 April 2009 22:16:58 Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > Quoting "Yoshinori K. Okuji" :
> > > "test -n" should be avoided. Maybe this is not necessary nowadays, but my
> > > old lesson was to use "test x$target_alias != x" instead for
37 matches
Mail list logo
