I posted binaries from grub2 rev 2074 with all modules, for further evaluation - http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=7061606&postcount=595
(post #595 grub2074.tar.gz ) On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Peter Cros <pxwp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > SVN rev 2074 should be good for Xserve1,1 and 1,2 according to tests we ran > at ubuntu forums. > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Drew Rosen <drew...@mac.com> wrote: > >> Hi Peter Cros, >> >> If you need anyone to run tests on the Xserve, I have a score of machines >> that we want to use on Linux... >> >> >> >> >> On Apr 9, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Peter Cros wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> It will be good to get this resolved and on SVN grub2 so people >>> (ubuntuforums) can build for Apple efi with the latest 'hacks' >>> (fakebios, loadbios etc) found necessary in testing. Particlarly >>> Xserve which requires efi boot. >>> >>> >>> On 4/7/09, Bean <bean12...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Yoshinori K. Okuji <ok...@enbug.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 01:43:17 Bean wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Bean <bean12...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Yoshinori K. Okuji <ok...@enbug.org> >>>>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I've undone r2063, since we're still discussing how to / not to split >>>>>>>> modules. Bean, you must respect teamwork. If you are unable to >>>>>>>> follow >>>>>>>> such a fundamental rule, I will have to disable your permission. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I thought the previous mail is about replacing grub_printf with >>>>>>> grub_dprint, I'm ok with that. This patch has been in mail list for >>>>>>> sometime, it is essential to get a working display in intel macs. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> How about this patch ? The split is necessary as it introduces new >>>>>> command loadbios and fakebios that uses the fake_bios_data function, >>>>>> and it would be ugly to put them all inside linux.c. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Do you have any strong reason to make loadbios and fakebios separate? I >>>>> think >>>>> the overhead is negligible. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> loadbios and fakebios are sort of like hacks for the efi platform, I >>>> think they shouldn't be placed in the linux loader. Also, by moving >>>> the platform dependent code out, we can merge it with i386 generic >>>> loader loader/i386/linux.c. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Bean >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Grub-devel mailing list >>>> Grub-devel@gnu.org >>>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Cros (pxw) >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Grub-devel mailing list >>> Grub-devel@gnu.org >>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Grub-devel mailing list >> Grub-devel@gnu.org >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel >> > > > > -- > Cros (pxw) > > > -- Cros (pxw)
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
