On Friday 01 February 2008 19:44, Paul Elliott wrote:
> > Would not the boot device be hd0?
>
> No, usually the first hard disk is hd0, the second hard disk
> is hd1, and the usb sticks come after that. At least that is
> how it works under my computer. Usually it is because the number
> of hard di
On Friday 01 February 2008 20:58, Robert Millan wrote:
> The following function name:
>
> normal/main.c:read_config_file (const char *config, int nested)
>
> is missleading. It does actually execute the config file, not just
> read it. Does it seem fine to rename it?
>
> How about `process_conf
On Saturday 02 February 2008 13:14, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Friday 01 February 2008 20:58, Robert Millan wrote:
> > The following function name:
> >
> > normal/main.c:read_config_file (const char *config, int nested)
> >
> > is missleading. It does actually execute the config file, not ju
On Friday 01 February 2008 21:02, Robert Millan wrote:
> normal.mod seems to insist in displaying a menu even if grub.cfg didn't
> define any menu entries. This seems to be due to a bogus check (for
> menu instead of menu->size).
It is not completely bogus, since MENU can be NULL. Probably what y
On Friday 01 February 2008 22:19, Oleg Strikov wrote:
> Good day!
>
> Let's look at grub_cmdline_get() func code:
>
> /* normal/cmdline.c - line 300 */
> plen = grub_utf8_strlen (prompt);
> lpos = llen = 0;
> buf[0] = '\0';
>
> if ((grub_getxy () >> 8) != 0)
> grub_putchar ('\n');
>
>
On Friday 01 February 2008 22:41, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 12:49:11PM -0800, walt wrote:
> > I got grub2 compiled on NetBSD, so now on to OpenBSD:
> >
> > In file included from ../util/i386/pc/grub-mkimage.c:29:
> > ../include/grub/misc.h:43: warning: conflicting types for bui
On Friday 01 February 2008 23:48, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 11:45:50PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > +static void *
> > +grub_xrealloc (void *ptr, grub_size_t size)
> > +{
> > + void *value = grub_realloc (ptr, size);
> > + if (value == 0)
> > +grub_fatal ("Virtual memo
Hi,
This patch add joliet extension support for iso9660.
2008-02-02 Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* fs/iso9660.c (GRUB_ISO9660_VOLDESC_BOOT): New macro.
(GRUB_ISO9660_VOLDESC_PRIMARY): Likewise.
(GRUB_ISO9660_VOLDESC_SUPP): Likewise.
(GRUB_ISO9660_VOLDESC_PART): Like
Committed.
--
Bean
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
Committed.
--
Bean
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On Jan 31, 2008 8:43 PM, Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008-01-31 Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * conf/i386-pc.rmk (pkglib_IMAGES): Add cdboot.img.
> (cdboot_img_SOURCES): New variable.
> (cdboot_img_ASFLAGS): New variable.
> (cdboot_img_LDFLAGS): New variable.
Hi,
i can see that there are linux specific code in util/biosdisk.c,
perhaps we should move them to a separate file such as util/osdep.c ?
--
Bean
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How useful is the `hello' command? Is it more useful than `echo' ? How
> about getting rid of it?
It's a good and simple example of how to write a module. So I think
it serves its purpose. `echo' has the purpose of being useful to end
users.
--
Mar
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 01:11:18PM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
>
> It is already there. GRUB 2 already supports setting a root based on a
> filesystem label or a path.
>
What is the syntax? How do I set it up? Are there example grub2 setups?
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 09:51:38AM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
>> >
>> > grub_uint32_t
>> > grub_inl (grub_uint32_t *addr)
>> > {
>> > return *addr;
>> > }
>>
>> Nothing, except the missing volatile I guess. This just isn't an IO
>> port. So you can
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 10:19:55PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>
> any objection for this patch ? i would like to commit it soon.
Looks fine to me. Just a minor comment:
> +#define GRUB_BIOSDISK_MACHINE_CDROM_START 0xe0
> +#define GRUB_BIOSDISK_MACHINE_CDROM_END 0xf0
could you make this tab-indented?
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 03:35:18PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > How useful is the `hello' command? Is it more useful than `echo' ? How
> > about getting rid of it?
>
> It's a good and simple example of how to write a module. So I think
> it serv
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 01:20:04PM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
>
> I was mistaken. It really depends on the meaning of "execute". For me,
> executing a menu means analyzing the menu structure, displaying it,
> controlling user inputs, and so on. read_menu_config does not execute a menu
> i
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 10:29:20PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i can see that there are linux specific code in util/biosdisk.c,
> perhaps we should move them to a separate file such as util/osdep.c ?
In general I don't like very much to split unportable code in separate files
because it's easy t
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 01:20:49PM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Friday 01 February 2008 21:02, Robert Millan wrote:
> > normal.mod seems to insist in displaying a menu even if grub.cfg didn't
> > define any menu entries. This seems to be due to a bogus check (for
> > menu instead of menu-
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 01:38:28PM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> >
> > Does it make sense to move any of these two to kernel? Or to normal.mod ?
> > Or maybe just to un-static-ize them and leave them here?
>
> What would be other use cases?
No idea. I suggest we just leave grub_getline he
On Feb 3, 2008 12:33 AM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 10:19:55PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> >
> > any objection for this patch ? i would like to commit it soon.
>
> Looks fine to me. Just a minor comment:
>
> > +#define GRUB_BIOSDISK_MACHINE_CDROM_START 0xe0
> > +#d
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 01:16:50AM +0800, Bean wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2008 12:33 AM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 10:19:55PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> > >
> > > any objection for this patch ? i would like to commit it soon.
> >
> > Looks fine to me. Just a minor comm
Quoting Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It's a good and simple example of how to write a module. So I think
it serves its purpose. `echo' has the purpose of being useful to end
users.
If it's just an example, why not exclude it from the default builds? It
clutters the command list and do
Hi,
Here is a patch for testing purposes. I hope people can test this on
actual hardware. Testing will help a lot for the development of the
ATA driver.
The code to reset the channel was removed, replace with something that
only queries the channel. Code for probing IDE Controllers on the PCI
On Saturday 02 February 2008 18:05, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 01:38:28PM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > > Does it make sense to move any of these two to kernel? Or to
> > > normal.mod ? Or maybe just to un-static-ize them and leave them here?
> >
> > What would be other
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 07:48:57PM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > Ok, here's a new patch, with grub_getline returning NULL and the caller
> > handling "out of mem" error.
> >
> > Also fixed a memleak.
>
> You don't have to set grub_errno explicitly, because grub_realloc should do
> it.
>
>
Try the following grub.cfg:
cat (memdisk)/non-existant-file
echo this point should never be reached
read
You'll see that the echo is reached, even if cat returned an error.
This becomes much worse when found in situations like:
font (xxx)/some-file.pff
terminal gfxterm
and the font
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Try the following grub.cfg:
>
> cat (memdisk)/non-existant-file
> echo this point should never be reached
> read
>
> You'll see that the echo is reached, even if cat returned an error.
>
> This becomes much worse when found in situations like:
>
>
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 09:59:57PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Try the following grub.cfg:
> >
> > cat (memdisk)/non-existant-file
> > echo this point should never be reached
> > read
> >
> > You'll see that the echo is reached, even if cat r
Hello,
I have a problem with my grub2 installation. I am using the latest
Debian package (1.95+20080128-1)and I could properly boot using the
chainloader method suggested during the initial installation
(grub-legacy still in MBR and it calls grub2), but when I decided to
place grub2 in the MB
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 07:38:43PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a patch for testing purposes. I hope people can test this on
> actual hardware. Testing will help a lot for the development of the
> ATA driver.
>
> The code to reset the channel was removed, replace with something
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 04:41:06PM -0500, George Lengel wrote:
> When I reboot I get thrown into rescue mode and typing set shows
> grub>prefix= (hd0,7)/boot/grub
> grub>root=hd0,7
>
> If I manually set root to (hd2,7) and prefix to (hd2,7)/boot/grub I can
> insmod normal and then running normal
Hi,
Are there any plans for a kernel command line tag
in the multiboot2 draft?
Jonathan Kollasch
pgpH0XPRdJ8zt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On Feb 3, 2008 5:07 AM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 09:59:57PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
> > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Try the following grub.cfg:
> > >
> > > cat (memdisk)/non-existant-file
> > > echo this point should never be
Robert Millan wrote:
Sounds like grub_boot_drive not having the right info. It works when received
via multiboot, but not from boot.img.
Does the attached patch fix your problem? Just a guess ...
Hello,
Thanks for the try. It did not appear to make a difference, though I
cannot rule o
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 08:34 -0600, Paul Elliott wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 01:11:18PM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> >
> > It is already there. GRUB 2 already supports setting a root based on a
> > filesystem label or a path.
Indeed! That's much easier that LVM :-)
> What is the synt
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 08:29:48PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any plans for a kernel command line tag
> in the multiboot2 draft?
Oh, there it is. Nevermind.
Jonathan Kollasch
pgpjAhRdmAzUO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
38 matches
Mail list logo
