At Fri, 03 Nov 2006 14:45:52 -0600,
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 13:48 +0100, Johan Rydberg wrote:
> > Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > --- grub2-cvs.orig/include/grub/types.h 2006-10-31 19:06:47.0
> > > -0600
> > > +++ grub2-cvs/include/grub/
[Please keep both and in the
recipients list.]
Hello!
For some time, GCC now offers the following feature:
info Gcc
#v+
`-fstack-protector'
Emit extra code to check for buffer overflows, such as stack
smashing attacks. This is done by adding a guard variable to
functions with
Hi,
Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 08 Nov 2006 22:40:54 +0100, a écrit :
> then cat gnumach-undef-bad; exit 2; else true; fi
> stack_chk_fail
>
> Is it feasible to have the `-fstack-protector' functionality in GNU Mach
> and GRUB2 (and how to do that, then) or shall we unconditionally pass
> `-f
Hello!
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 11:14:19PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 08 Nov 2006 22:40:54 +0100, a ?crit :
> > Is it feasible to have the `-fstack-protector' functionality in GNU Mach
> > and GRUB2 (and how to do that, then) or shall we unconditionally pass
> > `-fno-s
Hi,
* Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061108 23:14]:
> Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 08 Nov 2006 22:40:54 +0100, a écrit :
> > then cat gnumach-undef-bad; exit 2; else true; fi
> > stack_chk_fail
> >
> > Is it feasible to have the `-fstack-protector' functionality in GNU Mach
> > and GRUB2
Hi,
Stefan Reinauer, le Wed 08 Nov 2006 23:36:44 +0100, a écrit :
> * Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061108 23:14]:
> > Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 08 Nov 2006 22:40:54 +0100, a écrit :
> > > then cat gnumach-undef-bad; exit 2; else true; fi
> > > stack_chk_fail
> > >
> > > Is it feasib
