Hi,
* Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061108 23:14]:
> Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 08 Nov 2006 22:40:54 +0100, a écrit :
> > then cat gnumach-undef-bad; exit 2; else true; fi
> > stack_chk_fail
> >
> > Is it feasible to have the `-fstack-protector' functionality in GNU Mach
> > and GRUB2 (and how to do that, then) or shall we unconditionally pass
> > `-fno-stack-protector' if available?
>
> I'd say it shouldn't be very hard to provide a stack_chk_fail function,
> even if all it does is just panic().
wont this add unnecessary bloat to the binary? No, not the function
calling panic. Or are we seriously concerned about buffer overflows
in the bootloader?
S.
--
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] • http://www.coresystems.de/
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
