On 05/24/2010 06:42 AM, BVK Chaitanya wrote:
2010/5/21 Grégoire Sutre:
The processing of option `-o' in grub-mkconfig only works when
it is the first option.
IMO this issue might have been fixed in experimental branch, by
fix-cmdline-parsing (or similar) branch. I am on travel, so I cannot
2010/5/21 Grégoire Sutre :
>
> The processing of option `-o' in grub-mkconfig only works when
> it is the first option.
>
IMO this issue might have been fixed in experimental branch, by
fix-cmdline-parsing (or similar) branch. I am on travel, so I cannot
confirm this now :-(
--
bvk.chaitanya
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 02:19:36PM +0200, Grégoire Sutre wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the patch, it works fine. I'm just wondering: Is keeping
>> `-o' worth the extra complication?
>>
>
> I think so. It's probably stuck in a number of people's heads by now.
>
> If we want
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 02:19:36PM +0200, Grégoire Sutre wrote:
> Thanks for the patch, it works fine. I'm just wondering: Is keeping
> `-o' worth the extra complication?
I think so. It's probably stuck in a number of people's heads by now.
If we want to simplify things, we should use something
On 05/21/2010 12:57 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
Thanks for the patch, it works fine. I'm just wondering: Is keeping
`-o' worth the extra complication?
Grégoire
How about:
=== modified file 'util/grub-mkconfig.in'
--- util/grub-mkconfig.in 2010-04-19 19:25:41 +
+++ util/grub-mkconfig.in
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:08:48PM +0200, Grégoire Sutre wrote:
> The processing of option `-o' in grub-mkconfig only works when
> it is the first option. The code is:
>
> # Check the arguments.
> for option in "$@"; do
> case "$option" in
> [...]
> -o)
> shift
> grub_cfg=$1
>
