On 4/19/21 7:56 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> Could you send the patch to the mailing list separately with git send-email
>> or so that it doesn't get overlooked in the longer discussion we had?
>>
>
> Yes, I was waiting for someone else more familiar with the COFF/PE binary
>
On 4/19/21 5:33 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Javier1
>
> On 4/16/21 11:32 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> I can confirm that this fixes the issue and makes GRUB work again on ia64.
>>>
>>> Tested-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
>>>
>>
>> Great, thanks a lot for the quick testin
Hi Javier1
On 4/16/21 11:32 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> I can confirm that this fixes the issue and makes GRUB work again on ia64.
>>
>> Tested-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
>>
>
> Great, thanks a lot for the quick testing!
Could you send the patch to the mailing list separately with
Hello Adrian,
On 4/16/21 10:32 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
[snip]
>>
>
> I can confirm that this fixes the issue and makes GRUB work again on ia64.
>
> Tested-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
>
Great, thanks a lot for the quick testing!
Best regards,
Javier
Hi Javier!
On 4/16/21 10:14 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 4/16/21 6:55 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On 4/16/21 6:43 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>> It seems the patch no longer applies due to the changes introduced by the
>>> --sbat
>>> option [1].
>>
>> I
On 4/16/21 6:55 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 4/16/21 6:43 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> It seems the patch no longer applies due to the changes introduced by the
>> --sbat
>> option [1].
>
> I have manually rebased the patch like this. Rebuilding GRUB with that cha
Hi Javier!
On 4/16/21 5:21 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Thanks for the binaries, as you said the ".data" and "mods" sections had
> wrong size and content. Could you please try the following patch [0] ?
>
> It's an RFC since I'm not really an expert on binary formats, but there
> were a f
Hi!
On 4/16/21 6:43 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> It seems the patch no longer applies due to the changes introduced by the
> --sbat
> option [1].
I have manually rebased the patch like this. Rebuilding GRUB with that change
fixes the problem for me. So you'll just have to rebase your p
Hello Adrian,
Sorry for the delay, I didn't have time to look at this issue before.
On 4/12/21 8:57 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Javier!
>
> On 4/12/21 8:21 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Interesting, thanks for the input.
>>
>> Could you please share a both GRUB binary that
Hello Adrian,
Sorry for the delay, I didn't have time to look at this issue before.
On 4/12/21 8:57 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Javier!
>
> On 4/12/21 8:21 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Interesting, thanks for the input.
>>
>> Could you please share a both GRUB binary that
Hi Javier!
On 4/12/21 8:21 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Interesting, thanks for the input.
>
> Could you please share a both GRUB binary that works and one that
> fails to compare ?
Here are both the EFI as well as the GRUB directory for the broken
and working cases:
> https://people.d
Hello Adrian,
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 11:41 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>
> On 4/8/21 7:30 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > On 4/8/21 7:10 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >>> Any news on this? I assume this should be trivial to fix when considering
> >>> just the
> >>
> >>
On 4/8/21 7:30 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 4/8/21 7:10 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> Any news on this? I assume this should be trivial to fix when considering
>>> just the
>>
>> Not yet, sorry. I discussed a little bit with Peter yesterday but it's
>> strange
>> that only
On 4/8/21 7:10 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Any news on this? I assume this should be trivial to fix when considering
>> just the
>
> Not yet, sorry. I discussed a little bit with Peter yesterday but it's strange
> that only affects ia64 and not x64. I'll try to take a look at this next
[ adding Peter Jones who authored the patch ]
On 4/8/21 6:45 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Daniel!
>
> On 3/26/21 7:43 PM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>>> The address pointing to the modules within the GRUB core.img no longer
>>> matches
>>> the actual position of the modules. Hence, GRUB ca
Hi Daniel!
On 3/26/21 7:43 PM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>> The address pointing to the modules within the GRUB core.img no longer
>> matches
>> the actual position of the modules. Hence, GRUB can't load the built-in
>> modules
>> anymore.
>
> Ahhh... OK, great. So, only one bug to fix... :-)
Any ne
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 07:28:37PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Daniel!
>
> On 3/26/21 7:01 PM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> >> I have not bisected the issue yet, but maybe anyone has got any idea?
> >
> > May I ask you to do a bisect for us?
>
> The issue was introduced by this patch as d
Hi Daniel!
On 3/26/21 7:01 PM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>> I have not bisected the issue yet, but maybe anyone has got any idea?
>
> May I ask you to do a bisect for us?
The issue was introduced by this patch as discussed here [1]:
From: Peter Jones
Add a init_pe_section() helper function to setup
Hey Adrian,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 07:22:02PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hello!
>
> It seems that one of the security patches has caused a regression on ia64 as
> GRUB is no longer able to load any basic commands:
>
> Loading.: grub
> Starting: grub
> Welcome to GRUB!
> error: unkn
19 matches
Mail list logo
