Hello Adrian, On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 11:41 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > > On 4/8/21 7:30 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > On 4/8/21 7:10 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > >>> Any news on this? I assume this should be trivial to fix when considering > >>> just the > >> > >> Not yet, sorry. I discussed a little bit with Peter yesterday but it's > >> strange > >> that only affects ia64 and not x64. I'll try to take a look at this next > >> week. > > > > It's probably caused by different natural alignment which causes the code > > on x86_64 > > to land at the right position automatically. > > OK, so I had another discussion with Michael Karcher who analyzed the bug and > the > problem is apparently that after the change, mkimage adds an alignment to the > module > address which it did not before the change. > > And the suspicion why this affects ia64 and not x86_64 could be that the > module data > is properly aligned as mkimage expects while it's not on ia64. >
Interesting, thanks for the input. Could you please share a both GRUB binary that works and one that fails to compare ? Best regards, Javier _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
