Am Freitag, den 05.06.2009, 15:04 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> Am Freitag, den 05.06.2009, 14:26 +0200 schrieb Marco Gerards:
> > Felix Zielcke writes:
>
> > > So what should I do now?
> > > Placing it in normal.mod or minicmd.mod where it's included in rescue
> > > mode or placing it into a tr
Am Freitag, den 05.06.2009, 15:29 +0200 schrieb Marco Gerards:
> Oh, I didn't know minicmd.mod. Is it useful to have one instead of
> a few separate modules? Space of these smaller modules is not really
> a concern to me.
Bean split the commands out from kernel.
So especially help and lsmod are
Felix Zielcke writes:
> Am Freitag, den 05.06.2009, 14:26 +0200 schrieb Marco Gerards:
>> Felix Zielcke writes:
>
>> > So what should I do now?
>> > Placing it in normal.mod or minicmd.mod where it's included in rescue
>> > mode or placing it into a true.mod where the size increase would be
>> >
Am Freitag, den 05.06.2009, 14:26 +0200 schrieb Marco Gerards:
> Felix Zielcke writes:
> > So what should I do now?
> > Placing it in normal.mod or minicmd.mod where it's included in rescue
> > mode or placing it into a true.mod where the size increase would be
> > bigger?
>
> minicmd.mod is not
Felix Zielcke writes:
> Am Freitag, den 05.06.2009, 12:00 +0200 schrieb Marco Gerards:
>> Felix Zielcke writes:
>>
>> > Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 10:21 +0200 schrieb Marco Gerards:
>> >> Felix Zielcke writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 16:24 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
Am Freitag, den 05.06.2009, 12:00 +0200 schrieb Marco Gerards:
> Felix Zielcke writes:
>
> > Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 10:21 +0200 schrieb Marco Gerards:
> >> Felix Zielcke writes:
> >>
> >> > Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 16:24 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
> >> > Serbinenko:
> >> >> Howe
Felix Zielcke writes:
> Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 10:21 +0200 schrieb Marco Gerards:
>> Felix Zielcke writes:
>>
>> > Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 16:24 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
>> > Serbinenko:
>> >> However convention for
>> >> creating false is:
>> >> return grub_error (GRUB_ERR
Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 10:21 +0200 schrieb Marco Gerards:
> Felix Zielcke writes:
>
> > Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 16:24 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
> > Serbinenko:
> >> However convention for
> >> creating false is:
> >> return grub_error (GRUB_ERR_TEST_FAILURE, "false");
> >> and
Felix Zielcke writes:
> Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 16:24 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
> Serbinenko:
>> However convention for
>> creating false is:
>> return grub_error (GRUB_ERR_TEST_FAILURE, "false");
>> and not
>> return 1;
>
> Ok changed it. If everyone is fine with placing this in no
Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 16:24 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
Serbinenko:
> However convention for
> creating false is:
> return grub_error (GRUB_ERR_TEST_FAILURE, "false");
> and not
> return 1;
Ok changed it. If everyone is fine with placing this in normal/main.c, I
commit it.
--
Felix
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 30.05.2009, 17:14 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
> Serbinenko:
>> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > here's a simple patch which adds a `true' and a `false' command.
>> > `true' is actua
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2009, 17:14 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
Serbinenko:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > here's a simple patch which adds a `true' and a `false' command.
> > `true' is actually needed by the compatibility code generated by
> > grub-mkco
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here's a simple patch which adds a `true' and a `false' command.
> `true' is actually needed by the compatibility code generated by
> grub-mkconfig for the terminal.
As far as I understand they are useful only in normal mode. Perhaps
13 matches
Mail list logo