Am Freitag, den 05.06.2009, 12:00 +0200 schrieb Marco Gerards: > Felix Zielcke <fziel...@z-51.de> writes: > > > Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 10:21 +0200 schrieb Marco Gerards: > >> Felix Zielcke <fziel...@z-51.de> writes: > >> > >> > Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 16:24 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder' > >> > Serbinenko: > >> >> However convention for > >> >> creating false is: > >> >> return grub_error (GRUB_ERR_TEST_FAILURE, "false"); > >> >> and not > >> >> return 1; > >> > > >> > Ok changed it. If everyone is fine with placing this in normal/main.c, I > >> > commit it. > >> > >> Unless it is essential to do so, please do not place it in > >> normal/main.c. > > > > would normal/misc.c be okay or maybe a new file normal/true.c? > > I just don't think it's worth to create a new module for these 2 very > > little commands. > > The problem is with too many little commands, the size of normal.mod > grows. Although the commands are *very* small and I do not strongly > object to inclusion in normal.mod, if noone else has any objection.
The binary size of normal.mod would grow about 264 bytes whereas in minicmd.mod it would be just 260 bytes. But I already forgot that Bean wants to get rid of normal.mod. So what should I do now? Placing it in normal.mod or minicmd.mod where it's included in rescue mode or placing it into a true.mod where the size increase would be bigger? -- Felix Zielcke _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
