Re: [PATCH] DAC palette width retrieval

2009-08-04 Thread Robert Millan
Committed. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." ___

Re: [PATCH] DAC palette width retrieval

2009-07-25 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
>> *_mask normally shouldn't be used in index color by internal grub >> functions anyway. And if payload needs a special convention for >> passing color info for indexed modes it should be handled by loader > > Ok.  But if we decide that *_mask should go away, this is quite independant > from this

Re: [PATCH] DAC palette width retrieval

2009-07-25 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 02:24:22PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > > Now I'm not completely sure where does this belong.  I think it's somewhat > > generic and we can reasonably expect other OSes to want this information > > too, but I'm not completely sure. > For me putting these val

Re: [PATCH] DAC palette width retrieval

2009-07-25 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> Now I'm not completely sure where does this belong.  I think it's somewhat > generic and we can reasonably expect other OSes to want this information > too, but I'm not completely sure. For me putting these values to *_mask is ok but it may put some limits for future cards but as payloads have no