From: Goffredo Baroncelli
A portion of the logging code is moved outside of internal for(;;). The part
that is left inside is the one which depends on the internal for(;;) index.
This is a preparatory patch. The next one will refactor the code inside
the for(;;) into an another function.
Signed
From: Goffredo Baroncelli
A portion of the logging code is moved outside of internal for(;;). The part
that is left inside is the one which depends on the internal for(;;) index.
This is a preparatory patch. The next one will refactor the code inside
the for(;;) into an another function.
Signed
From: Goffredo Baroncelli
A portion of the logging code is moved outside of internal for(;;). The part
that is left inside is the one which depends on the internal for(;;) index.
This is a preparatory patch. The next one will refactor the code inside
the for(;;) into an another function.
Signed
From: Goffredo Baroncelli
A portion of the logging code is moved outside of internal for(;;). The part
that is left inside is the one which depends on the internal for(;;) index.
This is a preparatory patch. The next one will refactor the code inside
the for(;;) into an another function.
Signed
From: Goffredo Baroncelli
A portion of the logging code is moved outside of internal for(;;). The part
that is left inside is the one which depends on the internal for(;;) index.
This is a preparatory patch. The next one will refactor the code inside
the for(;;) into an another function.
Signed
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 07:39:52PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> A portion of the logging code is moved outside of internal for(;;). The part
> that is left inside is the one which depends on the internal for(;;) index.
>
> This is a preparatory patch. The next one will refactor the code insi
A portion of the logging code is moved outside of internal for(;;). The part
that is left inside is the one which depends on the internal for(;;) index.
This is a preparatory patch. The next one will refactor the code inside
the for(;;) into an another function.
Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli
On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 08:53:44PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> A portion of the logging code is moved outside of internal for(;;). The part
> that is left inside is the one which depends by the internal for(;;) index.
s/depends by/depends on/
> This is a preparatory patch: in the next one
A portion of the logging code is moved outside of internal for(;;). The part
that is left inside is the one which depends by the internal for(;;) index.
This is a preparatory patch: in the next one it will be possible to refactor
the code inside the for(;;) in an another function.
Signed-off-by: G
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 08:48:15PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> A portion of the logging code is moved outside a for(;;). The part that is
s/outside a for/outside of for/
> left inside is the one which depends by the for(;;) index.
s/depends by the for/depends on the for/
By the way, the
A portion of the logging code is moved outside a for(;;). The part that is
left inside is the one which depends by the for(;;) index.
This is a preparatory patch: in the next one it will be possible to refactor
the code inside the for(;;) in an another function.
---
grub-core/fs/btrfs.c | 25 +
11 matches
Mail list logo