On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:04:44AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 15:23 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:51:22PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > >
> > > If we are circumventing the standard Linux bootloader, perhaps we should
> > > communicate this to t
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 15:23 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:51:22PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> >
> > If we are circumventing the standard Linux bootloader, perhaps we should
> > communicate this to the Linux developers.
>
> This is not circumvention. We're using a 32-bi
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:06:25AM +0900, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> I don't know any reliable way. Some candidates:
>
> - The ramdisk max value. On 32-bit, initrd may not be loaded onto over 2GB.
> This is hard to change in Linux, so we can expect that this will not change.
> On 64-bit, curren
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:51:22PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 01:06 +0900, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > On Monday 30 March 2009 23:35:52 phcoder wrote:
> > > I confirm. I suppose that this check and message is bypassed with 32-bit
> > > loading mode. IMO grub2 should provid
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 01:06 +0900, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Monday 30 March 2009 23:35:52 phcoder wrote:
> > I confirm. I suppose that this check and message is bypassed with 32-bit
> > loading mode. IMO grub2 should provide an equivlent of this check. We
> > already have cpuid code. Does any
On Monday 30 March 2009 23:35:52 phcoder wrote:
> Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 13:53 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> >>> Here's a patch to rename `linux' to `linux16' and build the 32-bit
> >>> loader as simply `linux'.
> >>
> >> Committed.
> >
> > Just for your information. With th
Pavel Roskin wrote:
On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 13:53 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
Here's a patch to rename `linux' to `linux16' and build the 32-bit loader as
simply `linux'.
Committed.
Just for your information. With the old loader, booting an x86_64
kernel in qemu emulating i386 would result in
On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 13:53 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Here's a patch to rename `linux' to `linux16' and build the 32-bit loader as
> > simply `linux'.
>
> Committed.
Just for your information. With the old loader, booting an x86_64
kernel in qemu emulating i386 would result in a kernel me
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 05:00:32PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:50:56PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 02:09:11PM +0100, phcoder wrote:
> > > IMO linux16 for pc/linux.c would better reflect the difference with
> > > normal 'linux' command.
> >
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:50:56PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 02:09:11PM +0100, phcoder wrote:
> > IMO linux16 for pc/linux.c would better reflect the difference with
> > normal 'linux' command.
>
> I'm fine with that. Does anyone object to the proposed rename?
>
> N
10 matches
Mail list logo
