On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 05:00:32PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:50:56PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 02:09:11PM +0100, phcoder wrote: > > > IMO linux16 for pc/linux.c would better reflect the difference with > > > normal 'linux' command. > > > > I'm fine with that. Does anyone object to the proposed rename? > > > > Note this implies the new Linux loader becomes the default in grub-mkconfig > > setup (it is already but only with coreboot). > > Here's a patch to rename `linux' to `linux16' and build the 32-bit loader as > simply `linux'.
Committed. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
