Re: [PATCH] FAT, UFS and mtime

2009-04-05 Thread Yoshinori K. Okuji
On Saturday 04 April 2009 18:21:40 phcoder wrote: > Can someone review this patch? Looks good to me. Thanks, Okuji > phcoder wrote: > > mtime part > > 2009-03-15 Vladimir Serbinenko > > > > Support for mtime and further expandability of dir command > > > > * include/grub/lib/datetime.

Re: [PATCH] FAT, UFS and mtime

2009-04-04 Thread phcoder
Can someone review this patch? phcoder wrote: mtime part 2009-03-15 Vladimir Serbinenko Support for mtime and further expandability of dir command * include/grub/lib/datetime.h: moved to ... * include/grub/datetime.h: ... moved here and added declaration of grub_unixtime2date

Re: [PATCH] FAT, UFS and mtime

2009-03-15 Thread phcoder
UFS part (not related to mtime) 2009-03-15 Vladimir Serbinenko UFS improvements * fs/ufs.c (GRUB_UFS_BSD_DIRENT): new definition (struct grub_ufs_dirent): added fields for non-BSD dirents (grub_ufs_get_file_block): fixed double indirect handling (grub_u

Re: [PATCH] FAT, UFS and mtime

2009-03-13 Thread Robert Millan
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 05:25:10PM +0100, phcoder wrote: > Hello all. It seems that gcc has trouble with -m32 when structure is > passed as argument. So I replaced that part by a pointer. Also I made > some improvements to ufs code to support solaris branch of ufs. I tested > it also with fre

Re: [PATCH] FAT, UFS and mtime

2009-03-01 Thread Pavel Roskin
Quoting Bean : I suggest that you try some VCS that supports local commits, such as bzr or git. This make it easier to manage your patches before it's committed to upstream. I'm maintaining a git mirror. The details are here: http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2.git The synchronization stopped a few da

Re: [PATCH] FAT, UFS and mtime

2009-03-01 Thread Bean
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:17 AM, phcoder wrote: > Bean wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:25 AM, phcoder wrote: >>> >>> Hello all. It seems that gcc has trouble with -m32 when structure is >>> passed >>> as argument. So I replaced that part by a pointer. Also I made some >>> improvements to uf

Re: [PATCH] FAT, UFS and mtime

2009-03-01 Thread phcoder
Bean wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:25 AM, phcoder wrote: Hello all. It seems that gcc has trouble with -m32 when structure is passed as argument. So I replaced that part by a pointer. Also I made some improvements to ufs code to support solaris branch of ufs. I tested it also with freebsd an

Re: [PATCH] FAT, UFS and mtime

2009-03-01 Thread Bean
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:25 AM, phcoder wrote: > Hello all. It seems that gcc has trouble with -m32 when structure is passed > as argument. So I replaced that part by a pointer. Also I made some > improvements to ufs code to support solaris branch of ufs. I tested it also > with freebsd and netbs