Hello Daniel,
May I know the *Merge Plan* of Grub Master branch?
>From this time, we almost check grub master changes every day
and take enough patience to wait for the bugfix to be merged.
But we found the recent update of master branch has no our
two bugfix patches. If there are any extra problem
On 2/14/25 8:40 AM, Alec Brown wrote:
A Unified Kernel Image is a single UEFI PE file that combines a UEFI boot stub,
a Linux kernel image, an initrd, and further resources. The uki command will
locate where the uki file is and create a GRUB menu entry to load it.
Signed-off-by: Alec Brown
---
Thanks I will submit a GRUB documentation patch when I get back from
vacation.
Thanks!
Andrew
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 9:18 AM Daniel Kiper
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 09:43:59AM -0600, Andrew Hamilton wrote:
> > It seems this may impact some users attempting to use secure boot, I
> think I
On 2/14/25 8:40 AM, Alec Brown wrote:
Irritatingly, BLS defines paths relatives to the mountpoint of the
filesystem which contains its snippets, not / or any other fixed
location. So grub2-emu needs to know whether /boot is a separate
filesysem from / and conditionally prepend a path.
Signed-of
On 2/14/25 8:40 AM, Alec Brown wrote:
The BootLoaderSpec (BLS) defines a scheme where different bootloaders can
share a format for boot items and a configuration directory that accepts
these common configurations as drop-in files.
I have looked over this patch carefully (esp. the parsing routin
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 06:52:36PM -0500, Patrick Plenefisch wrote:
> Awesome! What do I do now?
Wait for push... :-)
Daniel
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On Sat, Jan 04, 2025 at 01:50:32AM -0600, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> This appears to be a relic from GRUB legacy that used a --dumb option for
> its terminal command. The proper way to do this in GRUB2 is to set the
> temrinal to "dumb" via the terminfo command.
>
> Fixes: https://savannah.gnu.org/bug
On Sat, Jan 04, 2025 at 01:41:15AM -0600, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> Support for @lbracechar{} and @rbracechar{} was added in GNU Texinfo 5.0,
> but many older systems may have versions lower than this. Use @{ and @}
> to support a wider range of GNU Texinfo versions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Glenn Washburn
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 01:02:43AM -0600, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> For arguments that are paths to files, print the full path of the file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Glenn Washburn
> ---
> grub-core/commands/ls.c | 8 +---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/grub-core/co
On systems which support multiple boot platforms such as BIOS and
EFI, it makes no sense to show menu entries which are not supported
by the current boot platform. Menu entries generated from os-prober
'chain' boot type use boot sector chainloading which is supported
by PC BIOS platform only.
Show
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 08:44:15PM +0300, Egor Ignatov wrote:
> The incorrect inode error from grub_xfs_read_inode did not propagate because
Something is off here. You drop two grub_print_error() calls but mention
one after grub_xfs_read_inode() call only. So?
> grub_print_error() resetted grub_e
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 05:28:30PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 03:41:22PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong via Grub-devel
> wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong
> >
> > The Linux port of XFS added a few new features in 2024. The existing
> > grub driver doesn't attempt to read or writ
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 08:44:14PM +0300, Egor Ignatov wrote:
> Commit ef7850c757 introduced multiple boundary checks in
> grub_xfs_iterate_dir()
> but handled the error incorrectly returning error code instead of 0.
>
> Also change the error message so that it doesn't match the message
> in grub_
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 08:44:13PM +0300, Egor Ignatov wrote:
I think you should explain in the commit message why this
patch is needed.
> Signed-off-by: Egor Ignatov
> ---
> grub-core/fs/xfs.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/grub-core/fs/xfs.c b/grub-core/fs/xfs.c
>
On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 03:41:22PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong via Grub-devel wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong
>
> The Linux port of XFS added a few new features in 2024. The existing
> grub driver doesn't attempt to read or write any of the new metadata, so
> all three can be added to the incompat allo
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 12:20:28PM +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> GRUB documentation states:
>
> ‘GRUB_OS_PROBER_SKIP_LIST’
> List of space-separated FS UUIDs of filesystems to be ignored from
> os-prober output. For efi chainloaders it’s @
>
> But the actual behaviour does not match this desc
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 07:26:57PM +0100, Tobias Powalowski via Grub-devel
wrote:
> Am 18.02.25 um 19:00 schrieb Daniel Kiper via Grub-devel:
> I am posting all the GRUB2 upstream patches which fix all security bugs
> found
> and reported up until now. Major Linux distros carry or will
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 10:02:54AM +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
> Michael Chang via Grub-devel on Fri, 2025/02/21 09:06:
> > Previously, the number of extent entries was not properly capped based
> > on the actual available space. This could lead to insufficient reads for
> > external extents, si
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 11:06:54AM +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
> Daniel Kiper via Grub-devel on Tue, 2025/02/18 19:00:
> > I am posting all the GRUB2 upstream patches which fix all security bugs
> > found and reported up until now. Major Linux distros carry or will carry
> > soon one form or ano
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 09:43:59AM -0600, Andrew Hamilton wrote:
> It seems this may impact some users attempting to use secure boot, I think I
> understand the reasoning behind this but maybe we should have something on the
> roadmap or issue tracker for what it would take to get these file system
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 12:20:39PM +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> On 20/02/2025 at 17:43, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 09:15:50AM +0100, Petr Řehák wrote:
> >>
> >> why is there a lockdown for the NTFS file system, please? Is it vulnerable
> >> as well when no CVE exists for it?
21 matches
Mail list logo
