Re: Arch Linux latest git snapshot has too many issues to be a new release base

On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 12:27:12PM +0100, Tobias Powalowski via Grub-devel wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > according to my unanswered mail 2 days ago, we tried to bump grub to latest > git snapshot. > > It failed for my co-maintainer in 2 cases: > > - loopback device seems to be broken Is the loopback

Re: Arch Linux latest git snapshot has too many issues to be a new release base

On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 12:27:12 +0100 Tobias Powalowski via Grub-devel wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > according to my unanswered mail 2 days ago, we tried to bump grub to > latest git snapshot. > > It failed for my co-maintainer in 2 cases: > > - loopback device seems to be broken > > - encrypted devi

Re: [SECURITY PATCH 14/73] fs/ext2: Fix out-of-bounds read for inline extents

Hi Unfortunately this fix did not go through and may cause issues when reading larger files, such as the initial ramdisk. I have posted a new patch in the hope that the problem will be correctly addressed this time. Sorry for the trouble. Michael On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 07:00:20PM +0100, Daniel

[PATCH] fs/ext2: Rework out-of-bounds read for inline and external extents

Previously, the number of extent entries was not properly capped based on the actual available space. This could lead to insufficient reads for external extents, since the computation was based solely on the inline extent layout. In this patch, when processing the extent header, we determine wheth

Re: [PATCH 0/6 v13] LVM Cachevol and Integrity volumes break entire LVM VG

Awesome! What do I do now? Patrick On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 11:08 AM Daniel Kiper wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 04, 2025 at 03:16:59PM -0500, Patrick Plenefisch wrote: > > In an effort to solve > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061168 for myself, > > I implemented basic support for c

Re: Is a 2.13 release planned in the next few months?

On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:33:20 +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote: >W will be working on the GRUB 2.14 release in the following months. >We have to clear some backlog and merge key features before doing that. Thanks, Daniel! ___ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel

Re: [PATCH 1/1] gdb: typo hueristic

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 06:45:29AM -0800, ross.philip...@oracle.com wrote: > On 1/16/25 4:25 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > %s/hueristic/heuristic/ > > > > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt > > --- > > grub-core/gdb_helper.py.in | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >

Re: Is a 2.13 release planned in the next few months?

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 05:45:56PM -0800, Forest wrote: > Hi, folks. > > Are there any plans for a GRUB 2.13 release soonish? I ask because I'm > curious about the chances of the passphrase retry feature that I contributed > last year ending up in Debian 13 (Trixie), the timeline of which was just

Re: [SECURITY PATCH 49/73] fs: Disable many filesystems under lockdown

Hi Petr, On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 09:15:50AM +0100, Petr Řehák wrote: > Hello, > > why is there a lockdown for the NTFS file system, please? Is it vulnerable > as well when no CVE exists for it? We are developers of computer-aided > assistive technology for blind and visually impaired Windows users

Re: [PATCH] commands/file: Fix null dereference in the knetbsd tests

On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 12:46:08PM -0800, Ross Philipson via Grub-devel wrote: > On 1/5/25 12:24 AM, Glenn Washburn wrote: > > From: Lukas Fink > > > > The pointer returned by grub_elf_file() is not checked to verify it is not > > null before use. A null pointer may be returned when the given file

Re: [PATCH] disk/ahci.c: remove conditional operator for endtime

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 02:10:24PM -0600, Leo Sandoval wrote: > The conditional makes no sense when the two possible expressions have the same > value, so remove it (perhaps the compiler does it for us but better to remove > it). > > Signed-off-by: Leo Sandoval Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper Daniel

Re: [PATCH] term/nns8250-spcr: return if redirection is disabled

On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:01:26AM -0600, Leo Sandoval wrote: > From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt > > The Microsoft spec for SPCR says "The base address of the Serial Port register > set described using the ACPI Generic Address Structure, or 0 if console > redirection is disabled." so return if disable

Re: [PATCH 0/6 v13] LVM Cachevol and Integrity volumes break entire LVM VG

On Sat, Jan 04, 2025 at 03:16:59PM -0500, Patrick Plenefisch wrote: > In an effort to solve > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061168 for myself, > I implemented basic support for cachevol and integrity volumes in LVM. > > This is just an extension of the cachepool support that al

Arch Linux latest git snapshot has too many issues to be a new release base

Hi Daniel, according to my unanswered mail 2 days ago, we tried to bump grub to latest git snapshot. It failed for my co-maintainer in 2 cases: - loopback device seems to be broken - encrypted devices is not working anymore for him We decided to remove it from our [testing] repository again