On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> The x86-64 ABI specification requires a 16-byte-aligned stack. In some
> cases, GCC emits code that assumes this alignment, which crashes if not
> aligned. The EFI firmware is also entitled to assume that stack
> alignment without checking,
Sources at 6fcec439545c817fbc8e2f51c667a70037a34a76
Building RPM for PPC (32 or 64 bits) I get
[ 187s] cat syminfo.lst | sort | gawk -f ../../grub-core/genmoddep.awk >
moddep.lst || (rm -f moddep.lst; exit 1)
[ 187s] __ashldi3 in affs is not defined
[ 187s] _restgpr_14_x in affs is not define
On lun, 2013-11-11 at 10:10 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 21:52 +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
> wrote:
> > Hello, all. pvgrub2 has just became part of upstream grub as ports i386-xen
> > and x86_64-xen.
>
> This is super cool, thanks!
>
Indeed!
Actually, it w
On 14.11.2013 22:11, M A Young wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>
>> On 14.11.2013 19:57, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>>> On 14.11.2013 19:48, M A Young wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>>>
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 14.11.2013 19:57, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 14.11.2013 19:48, M A Young wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 14.11.2013 18:03, M A Young wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov
Go ahead.
On 14.11.2013 20:59, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> ---
> grub-core/Makefile.core.def | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/grub-core/Makefile.core.def b/grub-core/Makefile.core.def
> index 6114519..4fff57f 100644
> --- a/grub-core/Makefile.core.def
> +++ b/grub-core/Makef
---
grub-core/Makefile.core.def | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/grub-core/Makefile.core.def b/grub-core/Makefile.core.def
index 6114519..4fff57f 100644
--- a/grub-core/Makefile.core.def
+++ b/grub-core/Makefile.core.def
@@ -1914,6 +1914,7 @@ module = {
module = {
name = sig
On 14.11.2013 19:57, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On 14.11.2013 19:48, M A Young wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>>
>>> On 14.11.2013 18:03, M A Young wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, M A Young wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Nov
On 14.11.2013 19:48, M A Young wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>
>> On 14.11.2013 18:03, M A Young wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, M A Young wrote:
>>>
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On 13.11.2013
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 14.11.2013 18:03, M A Young wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, M A Young wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 13.11.2013 20:06, M A Young wrote:
It doesn't seem to understand sub-partitio
On 14.11.2013 18:03, M A Young wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, M A Young wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>>
>>> On 13.11.2013 20:06, M A Young wrote:
It doesn't seem to understand sub-partitions. I can get it to work if
the boot files are
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, M A Young wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 13.11.2013 20:06, M A Young wrote:
It doesn't seem to understand sub-partitions. I can get it to work if
the boot files are in /dev/xvda but not in /dev/xvda1 .
insmod part_msdos
ins
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 03:06:25PM +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> Good work. Few minor problems:
> On 14.11.2013 13:35, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > +
> > + grub_arch_sync_caches_real (address, len);
> Why not do alignment here? You could align for both dcache and icache,
> thi
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 03:12:28PM +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> > It depends on Vladimir's __ctz[sd]i2 implementation, without which
> > grub-mkimage will fail with a "missing symbol" error.
> >
> I haven't seen ctz? Is it not needed after all or do you use my patch?
Apo
On 14.11.2013 13:35, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> This patch brings support for UEFI on the 64-bit ARM architecture.
> It does not yet include a Linux loader, as the boot protocol for
> UEFI platforms is not yet fully agreed. The chainloader can be used
> to load a kernel with an integrated UEFI stub loa
Good work. Few minor problems:
On 14.11.2013 13:35, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> +
> + grub_arch_sync_caches_real (address, len);
Why not do alignment here? You could align for both dcache and icache,
this simplifies asm part and makes it a bit more robust.
> + grub_uint32_t insword, insmask;
> + grub
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2013-11-10 19:01 (Europe/Helsinki):
Hello, all. We've switched to git some time ago, now we should have some
kind of workflow documents. In particular I think of following points:
- Developpers with commit access can create branches as they see fit as
long a
This patch brings support for UEFI on the 64-bit ARM architecture.
It does not yet include a Linux loader, as the boot protocol for
UEFI platforms is not yet fully agreed. The chainloader can be used
to load a kernel with an integrated UEFI stub loader.
Instructions for how to build and set up UEF
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 13.11.2013 20:06, M A Young wrote:
It doesn't seem to understand sub-partitions. I can get it to work if
the boot files are in /dev/xvda but not in /dev/xvda1 .
insmod part_msdos
insmod part_gpt
Right, if I add those to th
On 13.11.2013 14:56, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 09:40:29PM +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder'
> Serbinenko wrote:
>> On 15.07.2013 20:00, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> There is a discussion on the linux-kernel mailing list in which the
>>> Linus states th
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 01:24:02AM +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> >> Hm. I'm confused. According to
> >> http://stuff.mit.edu/afs/sipb/project/egcs/src/egcs/gcc/config/arm/README-interworking:
> >> "Note that specifying -mthumb-interwork does result in slightly larger,
> >>
On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 19:25 +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> On 13.11.2013 17:36, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 21:52 +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
> > wrote:
> >> Hello, all. pvgrub2 has just became part of upstream grub as ports
> >> i386-xen a
On 13.11.2013 04:59, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> В Tue, 12 Nov 2013 18:26:39 -0800
> Josh Triplett пишет:
>
>> EFI supports allocating memory below a specified address; use that to
>> implement GRUB_MMAP_MALLOC_LOW by requesting memory below 1M.
>
> Out of curiosity - why would you need it on EFI?
On 13.11.2013 03:26, Josh Triplett wrote:
> EFI supports allocating memory below a specified address; use that to
> implement GRUB_MMAP_MALLOC_LOW by requesting memory below 1M.
As discussed on the IRC, using mmap isn't right way to allocate
transient low memory space. This would merit a separate f
>
> diff --git a/grub-core/kern/x86_64/efi/startup.S
> b/grub-core/kern/x86_64/efi/startup.S
> index f86f019..94bd6ae 100644
> --- a/grub-core/kern/x86_64/efi/startup.S
> +++ b/grub-core/kern/x86_64/efi/startup.S
> @@ -29,7 +29,11 @@ start:
> _start:
> movq%rcx, EXT_C(grub_efi_image_ha
25 matches
Mail list logo
