On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 01:39:23 Bean wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is another update of the patch.
>>
>> 1, Now completion.c is in menu.mod, and menu_viewer.c is in misc.mod,
>> the reason for the switch is to allow configfile to depend on
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Chip Panarchy wrote:
> Hello
>
> Thanks everyone for your replies.
>
> I know for a fact that FreeBSD 32-bit can work with GRUB2
> (http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3194&page=2).
>
> I have asked Djn (I'd created a topic asking how to install FreeBSD
> on
--- On Thu, 4/9/09, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> From: Yoshinori K. Okuji
> Subject: Re: stat for FreeBSD
> To: "The development of GRUB 2"
> Date: Thursday, April 9, 2009, 7:31 PM
> On Wednesday 08 April 2009 23:32:18
> Andrey Shuvikov wrote:
> > --- On Mon, 4/6/09, Yoshinori K. Okuji
> wrote:
Hello
Thanks everyone for your replies.
I know for a fact that FreeBSD 32-bit can work with GRUB2
(http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3194&page=2).
I have asked Djn (I'd created a topic asking how to install FreeBSD
onto Logical Partitions, and he had worked out how to do so... with
32-b
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 01:39:23 Bean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is another update of the patch.
>
> 1, Now completion.c is in menu.mod, and menu_viewer.c is in misc.mod,
> the reason for the switch is to allow configfile to depend on misc.mod
> only.
I think the name "misc.mod" is ugly. Can you think
On Friday 10 April 2009 08:20:26 phcoder wrote:
> Your info helps, I'll have a look at the issue. Depending on how much
> work is needed it may be desirable to copy the code from bsd loader. as
> it's under bsd-licence it's gpl-compatible. Could just the maintainers
> confirm that it's ok to includ
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 23:32:18 Andrey Shuvikov wrote:
> --- On Mon, 4/6/09, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > From: Yoshinori K. Okuji
> > Subject: Re: stat for FreeBSD
> > To: "The development of GRUB 2"
> > Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 8:35 PM
> > On Tuesday 07 April 2009 00:48:37
> >
> > And
I can test any patches with FBSD6/7/i386/amd64/pxe/xen/etc. I don't have a
grub-gdb setup yet, but I probably should build one anyways.
Building a git-svn mirror of fbsd-base would be resource intensive to say
the least ;-) (It has been done on a few private systems)
joey
phcoder writes:
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 14:25:53 Bean wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > On Tuesday 07 April 2009 01:43:17 Bean wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Bean wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Yoshinori K. Okuji
> >
> > wrote:
> >> >> I've undon
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 10:18:30 phcoder wrote:
> Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> >>> 1) double the size of flags. 8 features per category seems to be few.
> >
> > I do not agree on this. As you can see, most bits are still undefined
> > after over 10-year usage of the Multiboot Specification. I do no
You can use git with svn backend.
Your info helps, I'll have a look at the issue. Depending on how much
work is needed it may be desirable to copy the code from bsd loader. as
it's under bsd-licence it's gpl-compatible. Could just the maintainers
confirm that it's ok to include some chunks of t
phcoder writes:
Hello, could you do a research and tell me which binary format does
bsd64 use, the handoff CPU and the arguments on the stack?
*planes fly over my head*
Does this help?
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=114379
I got that from looking over the svn log f
This patch is ok. it shouldn't be int.
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 14:05 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller
> Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > The 'actual' argument to various ieee1275 functions is of type
> > "grub_ssize_t" but several spots were erroneously using "int".
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 15:44 +0200, phcoder wrote:
> Carlos Roberto do Nascimento Costa wrote:
> > Hello phcoder. thank you for reviewing this patch.
> You're welcome
> >
> > phcoder wrote:
> >> Perhaps putting it into normal.mod instead of separate module is a good
> >> idea
> >
> > When I did th
From: Manoel Rebelo Abranches
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 18:42:08 -0300
> At first it seems ok. I'll test it in the weekend ok?
Thanks! Let me know how it goes.
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-d
At first it seems ok. I'll test it in the weekend ok?
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 14:05 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller
> Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:03:26 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > 2009-04-07 David S. Miller
> >
> > * disk/ieee1275/nand.c (grub_nand_open): All ieee1275 call arg
> > s
From: David Miller
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
> The 'actual' argument to various ieee1275 functions is of type
> "grub_ssize_t" but several spots were erroneously using "int".
>
> This happens to work on powerpc but does not on sparc64.
>
> 2009-04-07 David S. Miller
>
>
From: David Miller
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:03:26 -0700 (PDT)
> 2009-04-07 David S. Miller
>
> * disk/ieee1275/nand.c (grub_nand_open): All ieee1275 call arg
> slots are of type grub_ieee1275_cell_t.
> (grub_nand_read): Likewise.
> * kern/ieee1275/ieee1275.c (IEEE1275
Hi,
It will be good to get this resolved and on SVN grub2 so people
(ubuntuforums) can build for Apple efi with the latest 'hacks'
(fakebios, loadbios etc) found necessary in testing. Particlarly
Xserve which requires efi boot.
On 4/7/09, Bean wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Yoshinori K
Carlos Roberto do Nascimento Costa wrote:
Hello phcoder. thank you for reviewing this patch.
You're welcome
phcoder wrote:
Perhaps putting it into normal.mod instead of separate module is a good
idea
When I did this patch, I was thinking: clear is a command like ls, lspci,
reboot, sleep, su
20 matches
Mail list logo
