Exactly how do you generate a .mk file from the .rmk files. What is
the ruby command line to do this?
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On 3/15/07, Gregg Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, as a matter of fact. The LZO issue is one that's been surrounding
us for the entire period that we've been running this project.
In attempting to build GRUB 1.95, I'm still running into the "LZO library
version 1.02 or later is required"
This patch fixes the situation with i386-pc where grub-probe &
grube-setup are searching for the root fs for grub files and they
happen to be on the same file system as the root ("/") filesystem. If
this is the case if when probing /dev , if the partition is a sd* it
will not find it because it w
This patch is derived from the patch sent earlier by Lubomir Kundrak.
What this patch adds is for library directories and directories in
/boot to be changed as well. So the user can easily launch
./configure --program-transform-name="s/grub/grub2/"
And the installed files (in this case for i386-
On 3/15/07, James Hartley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/15/07, Gregg C Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you see any problems regarding the LZO version, and more importantly as
> to where it was placed? Or just with the binary utilities?
I have run into the "LZO library version 1.02 or la
On 3/15/07, Gregg C Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you see any problems regarding the LZO version, and more importantly as
to where it was placed? Or just with the binary utilities?
I have run into the "LZO library version 1.02 or later is required" message,
however, I also found the fo
Hello!
We do need to update the versions for our project. Ideally that should state
that the version you are seeing on the GRUB2 pages is the minimum version to
build it.
Do you see any problems regarding the LZO version, and more importantly as
to where it was placed? Or just with the binary util
I'm confused by what I'm seeing in the documentation. The following page on
GRUB:
http://directory.fsf.org/GNU/grub.html
...states that binutils 2.9.1.0.23 is required to build, but the following
page:
http://directory.fsf.org/GNU/binutils.html
...states that version 2.17 is the latest stable
Hello!
Not that I know of.
However currently the group is focusing on cleaning up the menus. The whole
idea behind the splash image is one that seemed to be of interest to the
distribution users, at least in case of the original ideas behind GRUB.
Now as to your assertion concerning Savannah bei
Dne 15 Březen 2007, 03:55, Hollis Blanchard napsal(a):
> On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 09:47 -0800, Daniel Weaver wrote:
>
>> I would like to propose a definition for "Native Endianess"
>>
>>
>> The data has Native Endianess when a 32-bit read will return the
>> correct value without byte swap.
>
> What o
At Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:44:21 +0100,
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 13 March 2007 13:38, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > We should come up with a idea list today, because tomorrow Google will
> > begin accepting applications. I think we should just start with
> > http://www.gnu.org/software/gru
Hi all,
Is there any updates about progress of splashimage module? I'm one of
developers of EastLinux distro, and I really want this distro to be released
with grub2, but background in grub2 is strongly needed =((. Looks like
Savannah is down, where from can I take latest snapshot?
Regards,
K
12 matches
Mail list logo
