On 3/15/07, James Hartley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/15/07, Gregg C Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you see any problems regarding the LZO version, and more importantly as
> to where it was placed? Or just with the binary utilities?
I have run into the "LZO library version 1.02 or later is required" message,
however, I also found the following link which states that playing with the
flags sent to the linker can be used as a workaround:
http://www.arcknowledge.com/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.grub.devel/2006-04/msg00074.html
Are you saying that the LZO issue is the only problem to be worked around, &
that having binutils 2.17 is sufficient?
Thanks for any clarification you can provide.
Jim
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
Hello!
Yes, as a matter of fact. The LZO issue is one that's been surrounding
us for the entire period that we've been running this project.
--
Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"This signature was once found posting rude
messages in English in the Moscow subway."
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
