On 2024-08-08 07:16:03 -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> At 2024-08-08T10:07:35+0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > Hmmm, I see. Thanks! I think "If x is ±0" is the clearest way to say
> > it. I'm not sure if that glyph is available everywhere, though. How
> > about "If x is 0 or -0"?
>
> I t
On 2024-08-09 15:53:30 +1000, John Gardner wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> > So ideally, the fallback for "±0" should be "+0 or -0", which is
> > much more readable and less ambiguous than "+-0" or "+/-0".
>
> For approximating ± in ASCII, is there some reason \z_+0 hasn't been
> considered?
I don't li
On 2024-08-09 19:38:48 +1000, John Gardner wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> > I really see a "+" underlined
>
> Is it visually distinct from an ordinary underscore? I merely ask now out
> of curiosity, as Brandan explained why overstriking is a no-go.
The underline bar is slightly different from an unde
On 2019-01-23 13:56:04 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> I'm not quite sure of the circumstances in which an attacker (presumably
> the author of a document you've received) might be able to control the
> arguments to gropdf; but regardless, this does seem to be undesirable
> command-line handling and I
