On 2024-08-09 15:53:30 +1000, John Gardner wrote: > Hi Vincent, > > > So ideally, the fallback for "±0" should be "+0 or -0", which is > > much more readable and less ambiguous than "+-0" or "+/-0". > > For approximating ± in ASCII, is there some reason \z_+0 hasn't been > considered?
I don't like that at all. I really see a "+" underlined, so it is confusing. Moreover, the information is not kept by copy-paste, and it is not rendered as wanted with "xterm +ulc" (to replace underline by color). And I don't think that it will correctly be interpreted by screen readers. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
