Hi.
> G. Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > So maybe they had access to a CAT-8 after all, and used a whopping 5
> > different font plates. Or they used a CAT-4 and had to compose many
> > pages in two passes. That would have been mightily tedious.
Mychaela Falconia wrote:
> Are you certain that
Hi Doug,
At 2024-06-27T13:38:09-0400, Douglas McIlroy wrote:
> Roff adopted the term "adjust" from Runoff, in the guise of.ad and
> .na,
To reassure you, I'm aware; I consulted this history for the roff(7)
page that shipped in groff 1.23.0, and was able to prepare a partial
chronology of request
At 2024-06-28T15:19:49-0400, Douglas McIlroy wrote:
> Oops, my last post ascribed Runoff to the 15th century, "sixty
> decades" ago.
That's okay--no one on TUHS saw it unless they're also subscribed to
groff@gnu.
I noticed, but parked my reply for a day to keep the list traffic volume
down.
Also
At 2024-06-28T04:07:56-0600, arn...@skeeve.com wrote:
> The use of .bd is indeed the case. I asked. :-)
> From BWK, forwarded by permission.
Thanks, Arnold! Mystery solved.
Regards,
Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> [2] Maybe introducing a replacement term, "rotated"--which is
> unused in the GNU pic manual except to define "aligned"--would
> be a good idea [...]
I don't think this is a good idea. "aligned" in pic means
the direction of the text is aligned with the direction of
the object:
.PS
arro
