> Ralph Corderoy wrote:
>
>> I’m typesetting entire books out of Markdown (specifically, >
>> MultiMarkdown).
>
> And that's the problem. Markdown is ill specified, poorly thought out,
> and in consequence there are many dialects of Markdown.
I always find it amusing when someone on a *roff
Hi,
git-version-gen is a very serious nuisance. It efficiently prevents
any kind of reliable testing. It creates totally ridiculous version
strings like "1.22.3.rc1.40-1327" which then get scattered all over
the place, up to and including absurd directory names like
.../share/groff/1.22.3.rc1
Hi Peter,
Peter Schaffter wrote on Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 07:36:36PM -0400:
> If om.tmac-u is removed from the sources and replaced
> with om.tmac (unstripped), the attached patch should give us
> what we want.
After a fierce fight resulting in the death of the vicious
git-version-gen dragon, i fi
Hi Larry,
> Let’s see… we have -man, -mdoc, -mm, -me, -mom
That are all distinct things, named differently, with different macros.
No one takes their -mm source and expects it to run with -mom. That's
like saying Asciidoc source should work with Markdown programs.
> 1) Most of the dialects are
Hi Ingo,
On Thu, Mar 15 2018 at 08:34:00 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> git-version-gen is a very serious nuisance. It efficiently prevents
> any kind of reliable testing. It creates totally ridiculous version
> strings like "1.22.3.rc1.40-1327" which then get scattered all over
> the place
