> \[t{no,+-,mu,di}] should be used in textual, \[{no,+-,mu,di}] in
> mathematical context. Normally, the latter glyphs are special glyphs
> (this is, in font `S'), and its vertical offsets make them not blend
> well into surrounding text.
Hi Werner,
groff_char does seem to address this issue reg
> If my supposition above is correct, I'll create a patch to add the
> *** marker to the four glyphs in question.
Great!
> Also, both the mathematical and text glyph of each pair have the
> same Unicode value, and groff seems to interpret the Unicode strings
> as the mathematical-context version
