> If my supposition above is correct, I'll create a patch to add the
> *** marker to the four glyphs in question.
Great!
> Also, both the mathematical and text glyph of each pair have the
> same Unicode value, and groff seems to interpret the Unicode strings
> as the mathematical-context versions of these glyphs. (That is,
> e.g., \[u00D7] outputs the glyph represented by \[mu] rather than
> \[tmu].) Does this make sense as the default?
I think so, yes, for historical and backwards-compatibility reasons.
Werner
