On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:07:01AM +, anonymous wrote:
From: anonymous
Subject: [bug #43569] Fix for compile warnings with gcc 4.6.3
"anonymous" was me. Failed to log in first.
Sorry,
ulrich
> From: anonymous
> Subject: [bug #43569] Fix for compile warnings with gcc 4.6.3
Thanks!
Werner
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 01:27:37PM +, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Ubuntu's package manager? http://packages.ubuntu.com/utopic/groff says
> 14.10's is currently 1.22.2-8 and that they take Debian's package,
> maintained by Colin Watson (who's on this list). That version is what's
> in Debian's `te
> > This is due to special, manually added, negative kern values
> > for those characters.
> Presumably though, it's still not as potentially good quality
> output as using the proper escape [...]
For most high-res devices and fonts, if you're using the right
kern values, the visual appearance w
Hallo Werner,
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
|> [...] i stumbled over a interpretation difference (full source
|> attached):
|>
|> source:
|> .It Fn at_quick_exit , Fn _atexit
|> groff and mandoc agree.
|> .It Fn at_quick_exit , _atexit
|> Only mandoc gets that right.
|>
|> mandoc:
|>
> Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 08:46:21 +0100 (CET)
> Cc: groff@gnu.org
> From: Werner LEMBERG
>
>
> >> I was imagining something primitive, e.g. a working equivalent to
> >>
> >> #if defined(__MSDOS__) || (defined(_WIN32) && !defined(__CYGWIN__))
> >> # define DOS2UNIX_FILENAME(f) dos2unix_filen
Hey, Ingo, Werner, list,
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
|Werner LEMBERG wrote on Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 02:19:38PM +0100:
|> Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|>> [...] i stumbled over a interpretation difference (full source
|>> attached):
|>>
|>> source:
|>> .It Fn at_quick_exit , Fn _atexit
|>> groff a
Hi Eli,
> +void normalize_for_lf (string &fn)
> +{
> +#if defined(__MSDOS__) || (defined(_WIN32) && !defined(__CYGWIN__))
> + int fnlen = fn.length();
> + for (int i = 0; i < fnlen; i++)
> +{
> + if (fn[i] == '\\')
> + fn[i] = '/';
> +}
> +#endif
> +}
One thing I think I've mis
Hi Steffen,
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 03:21:36PM +0100:
> Ok, but i really wonder now -- why? If it is normal that .Va and
> other requests extend until the next macro switches the current
> mode (the mdoc macros seem to transport significant amount of
> state from a shallow
