Hi Ulrich,
On Thu, Sep 25 2014 at 04:32:08 PM, Ulrich Lauther
wrote:
> I made some research and found:
>
> 1.
> with
> ./configure; make
> ./configure --prefix=/home/privat/groff_test; make; make install
> groff_test/bin/groff -v
if you change frequently your configurat
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:52:49AM +0200, Bertrand Garrigues wrote:
> Hi Ulrich,
>
>
> No, you found a bug ...
>
> > not to use "make clean" after changing the prefix; or missing
> > dependencies?
>
> The groff binary is not rebuilt, because defs.h was not regenerated, and
> thus defs.h still h
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:52:49AM +0200, Bertrand Garrigues wrote:
> Hi Ulrich,
>
> > This may be a fault on my side,
>
> No, you found a bug ...
>
> > not to use "make clean" after changing the prefix; or missing
> > dependencies?
>
> The groff binary is not rebuilt, because defs.h was not r
Hi,
I can open a bug report for this, but this seems like a change someone familiar
with the code could do in a few minutes, so I'm not sure it's worth the
overhead.
The problem:
Section 5.1.3 of groff info lists the input characters that by default are
considered transparent when determining
Ulrich,
On Fri, Sep 26 2014 at 12:15:22 PM, Ulrich Lauther
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:52:49AM +0200, Bertrand Garrigues wrote:
>> Calling 'make clean' or 'make distclean' fixed your problem. The error
>> message you got (missing file in site-font) is normal and comes from the
>> additio
Ulrich,
On Fri, Sep 26 2014 at 08:35:23 PM, Ulrich Lauther
wrote:
> yes, with your defs.patch applied (and the other patched stuff removed) it
> works:
>
> groff -v
>
> now gives:
>
> GNU groff version 1.22.2
> Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> [disclaimer stuff]
>
> called s
Ingo --
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Given that the build systems disables building HTML documentation
> when some support software is missing on the target system and
> that the main mom documentation is (very unfortunately, but that's
> the current state of affairs) HTML, we end
> Missing from this list is \[cq]. Groff regards this as a distinct
> input character from ', even though ' and \[cq] usually (always?)
> output the same glyph. \[cq] is semantically the more correct way
> to indicate the closing single quote that should be ignored in
> end-of-sentence detection
