Re: [Groff] groff variable for ideal

2014-06-17 Thread Bernd Warken
> Von: "Werner LEMBERG" > > > A `groff' option for running the `gideal' preprocessor is needed. I > > propose upper case `-J', because the lower case `-j' was used for > > `chem'. > > This is OK with me. Then I will install `-J' for `gideal'; `-j' for `chem' is already done. But I propose to

Re: [Groff] groff variable for ideal

2014-06-17 Thread Ulrich Lauther
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:24:46PM +0100, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Hi Bernd, > > > A `groff' option for running the `gideal' preprocessor is needed. > > Only once the preprocessor has a significant enough audience to make it > worthwhile? Meanwhile, it can continue to be explicitly pipelined? >

Re: [Groff] groff variable for ideal

2014-06-17 Thread Bernd Warken
> Von: "Ulrich Lauther" > > The way I handle preprocessors and other options, is, to put them into a > (pseudo-) comment > in the first line of a document, like e.g.: > > .\" tbl eqn lnd > > This line is interpreted by my groff shell script and I can never forget to > run the required > prep

[Groff] My way to run preprosessors and to set options

2014-06-17 Thread Ulrich Lauther
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:13:26PM +0200, Bernd Warken wrote: > > Von: "Ulrich Lauther" > > > > The way I handle preprocessors and other options, is, to put them into a > > (pseudo-) comment > > in the first line of a document, like e.g.: > > > > .\" tbl eqn lnd > > > > This line is interpret