> Von: "Werner LEMBERG"
>
> > A `groff' option for running the `gideal' preprocessor is needed. I
> > propose upper case `-J', because the lower case `-j' was used for
> > `chem'.
>
> This is OK with me.
Then I will install `-J' for `gideal'; `-j' for `chem' is already done.
But I propose to
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:24:46PM +0100, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hi Bernd,
>
> > A `groff' option for running the `gideal' preprocessor is needed.
>
> Only once the preprocessor has a significant enough audience to make it
> worthwhile? Meanwhile, it can continue to be explicitly pipelined?
>
> Von: "Ulrich Lauther"
>
> The way I handle preprocessors and other options, is, to put them into a
> (pseudo-) comment
> in the first line of a document, like e.g.:
>
> .\" tbl eqn lnd
>
> This line is interpreted by my groff shell script and I can never forget to
> run the required
> prep
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:13:26PM +0200, Bernd Warken wrote:
> > Von: "Ulrich Lauther"
> >
> > The way I handle preprocessors and other options, is, to put them into a
> > (pseudo-) comment
> > in the first line of a document, like e.g.:
> >
> > .\" tbl eqn lnd
> >
> > This line is interpret