Re: [Groff] nroff vs. troff conditional using escapes?

2008-02-27 Thread Michael(tm) Smith
"Michael(tm) Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2008-02-26 13:06 +0900: [quoting Ralph] > > Use Werner's macro idea but maybe add in > > > > .tr aAbBcCdDeEfFgGhHiIjJkKlLmMnNoOpPqQrRsStTuUvVwWxXyYzZ > > .tr aabbccddeeffgghhiijjkkllmmnnooppqqrrssttuuvvwwxxyyzz > > > > so you only have to enter on

Re: [Groff] Request "cf"

2008-02-27 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> After a lot of cutting it is now under 100k, I hope it will get > through. Thanks. It still exceeds the limit, but I've just approved the mail. Werner

Re: [Groff] nroff vs. troff conditional using escapes?

2008-02-27 Thread Michael(tm) Smith
Steve Izma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2008-02-26 11:14 -0500: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:01:57PM +0900, Michael(tm) Smith wrote: > > Subject: Re: [Groff] nroff vs. troff conditional using escapes? > > > > So I think what would actually best for me to try to do is have > > my app always generated the

[Groff] groff/man and Eastern European languages?

2008-02-27 Thread Michael(tm) Smith
Is there any best-practice information on how to use groff with Eastern European languages/characters? In particular, best practices for authoring man pages? I'd especially like to know what guidance there might be on what to do for code points that don't have named characters/escapes in groff (ű,

Re: [Groff] groff/man and Eastern European languages?

2008-02-27 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I'd especially like to know what guidance there might be on what to > do for code points that don't have named characters/escapes in groff > (ű, ő, ż, ă, ą, ā, ș, ć, č, etc.) -- basically, for Latin-2 I guess > (or Unicode Latin extended-A). In case you have proper fonts (or using a UTF-8 encod