Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > +.\" Emulate Bell Labs localisms by setting -r bell=1 on the command
> > +.\" line.
>
> Thanks. Shall this be documented? Then I would like to see patches
> for groff_ms.man, groff.texinfo, and NEWS.
Here:
Diffs between last version checked in and cur
Werner, I have a couple of minor improvements to the MathML patch;
notably, I've fixed a minor bug in the handling of inline equations
and another that attached an incorrect attribute to . Would
you prefer to receive an incremental patch or a rollup?
Not having write access to the CVS is starting
> Werner, I have a couple of minor improvements to the MathML patch;
> notably, I've fixed a minor bug in the handling of inline equations
> and another that attached an incorrect attribute to . Would
> you prefer to receive an incremental patch or a rollup?
Please send me the whole patch again;
> Diffs between last version checked in and current workfile(s):
Applied, thanks. Please test.
Werner
Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Diffs between last version checked in and current workfile(s):
>
> Applied, thanks. Please test.
Resyncing, and will do.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Werner, I have a couple of minor improvements to the MathML patch;
> > notably, I've fixed a minor bug in the handling of inline equations
> > and another that attached an incorrect attribute to . Would
> > you prefer to receive an incremental patch or a rol
Joerg van den Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think, beyond the manpage issue,
> it is not that unusual to find troff directives inside equations, e.g. to
> insert special
> symbols/characters not otherwise available. from the user perspective it
> would of course be nice, if these things were'nt e
> This time I'll add documentation patches.
Very good!
> > No problem. What's your Savannah account name?
>
> esr
You should now have write permission.
I have to work now (playing the second `Tristan' main piano
rehearsal); will later have a look at the eqn problem.
Werner
We can get rid of -r bell if we want.
1. We define .SC unconditionally.
2. It's a section-header macro, so it's going to be used very early in the
document if it's used at all.
3. Calling .SC sets the bell register, enabling the Bell Labs meaings
of .P1/.P2/.UC and disabling the Berkeley ones
Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You should now have write permission.
Thanks. I'll use them carefully, and not commit anything I haven't tested.
Here's my current work plan, subject to your approval:
1. Polish up and test a version of the eqn patch with full documentation.
Ship that to
The previous stuff on my agenda is done, but I'm not going to commit the
MathML patch yet; nobody has had time to review it.
When I go back to trying to make the man pages portable, I'm wondering what
the appropriate test protocol is. Is an eyeball check that it looks right
under both man in a t
> The previous stuff on my agenda is done, [...]
Please add a ChangeLog entry! I insist on having entries for
everything which isn't trivial (e.g., fixing typos in comments or
documentation).
> When I go back to trying to make the man pages portable, I'm
> wondering what the appropriate test pr
12 matches
Mail list logo
