Re: [Groff] moving TOC to start

2005-09-27 Thread Tadziu Hoffmann
> does anyone have any simple methods for placing the table of contents > at the start of the output file ? > > I have done it manually with Postscript output and should be able to > script that, but if anyone has other suggestions I would appreciate > hearing from them. I think manipulating the

Re: [Groff] moving TOC to start

2005-09-27 Thread Keith Marshall
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 2:06 pm, Tadziu Hoffmann wrote: > > does anyone have any simple methods for placing the table of contents > > at the start of the output file ? > >  > > I have done it manually with Postscript output and should be able to > > script that, but if anyone has other suggest

RE: [Groff] moving TOC to start

2005-09-27 Thread Ted Harding
On 26-Sep-05 Jason St Armand wrote: > Hi, > > does anyone have any simple methods for placing the table of contents > at the start of the output file ? > > I have done it manually with Postscript output and should be able to > script that, but if anyone has other suggestions I would appreciate >

Re: [Groff] moving TOC to start

2005-09-27 Thread Heinz-Jürgen Oertel
Am Dienstag, 27. September 2005 15:06 schrieb Tadziu Hoffmann: > > does anyone have any simple methods for placing the table of contents > > at the start of the output file ? > > > > I have done it manually with Postscript output and should be able to > > script that, but if anyone has other sugges

[Groff] Strange page header problem

2005-09-27 Thread Lei Ming
Hi, I encountered a strange problem with page header. Following is a small test case. Please process it with groff and see the PostScript output. .\"__ .de H .tl 'X'Y'Z' \l'\n(.lu\(rn' .. .wh 0 H .br .sp 10.5i XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX

Re: [Groff] moving TOC to start

2005-09-27 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Since I first saw this technique, in Tadziu's own `tmac.diss' > documentation, I've been toying with ideas on how I might adapt it > for `pdfroff'. I'd actually like to engineer the concept directly > into groff itself. [...] I'm not convinced that this is the right way. For example, it is r