>> > I read it this way:
>> > |\_|will result in | |
>>
>> No, this is `_'.
>>
>> > |\$_| will result in ||
>>
>> No, this is `\_'.
>
> Werner, you got it the wrong way around. The short line is "\_" and
> the full line is "_".
Yes, thanks.
Werner
> > I read it this way:
> > |\_|will result in | |
>
> No, this is `_'.
>
> > |\$_| will result in ||
>
> No, this is `\_'.
Werner, you got it the wrong way around.
The short line is "\_" and the full line is "_".
Hi Werner,
> Obviously a bunch of typos.
appb.t contains
\f(CW_\fP or \f(CW=\fP:T{
As the only character in a line, extend a single or double horizontal
line the full width of the table.
T}
\f(CW\e$_\fP or \f(CW\e$=\fP:T{
Extend a single or double horizontal line the ful
>>> what takes me wonder is the question what went wrong with \$_ ?
>>
>> I don't know where the "\$_" comes from. It's not in the tbl
>> manpage, nor in the original tbl paper from Bell Labs.
>
> I got it from UTP page 487. This is my basic source.
Obviously a bunch of typos. For groff tbl,
Am 14.01.2011 20:29, schrieb Tadziu Hoffmann:
>
>> This works fine but it is not a future proof solution :)
>
> Hmmm. Why not?
>
>
>> what takes me wonder is the question what went wrong with \$_ ?
>
> I don't know where the "\$_" comes from. It's not in the tbl
> manpage, nor in the origi
> This works fine but it is not a future proof solution :)
Hmmm. Why not?
> what takes me wonder is the question what went wrong with \$_ ?
I don't know where the "\$_" comes from. It's not in the tbl
manpage, nor in the original tbl paper from Bell Labs.
Tbl can do two different line fills
May I suggest ...
.TS
tab(|);
c c cw(6c)
l l l.
Geraet|Seriennummer|Bemerkung
_
xx|1|
||_
xx|1|
||_
xx|1|
||_
xx|1|
||_
xx|1|
.TE
yields:
Geraet
This works fine but it is not a future proof solution :)
what takes me wonder is the question what went wrong with \$_ ?
and can some one make the \*_ solution more flexable so it will fill
the whole column automaticly ?
(i have changed the 6c every time this works for me but may be not for other
> but it look strange when you use:
> \*_|\*_
Sorry, it was a bit sloppy (and worked only when \*_ was in
the last column). This is better:
.ds _ \v'.1m'\D'l 6c 0'\v'-.1m'
or whatever vertical offset you prefer.
It is very nice,
but it look strange when you use:
\*_|\*_
I also changed from .1 to .3 (what looks in my context better).
re,
wh
Am 14.01.2011 10:44, schrieb Tadziu Hoffmann:
>
>> After printing my document i found that \_ does not do what i
>> expected. the line is to high more like - tha
> After printing my document i found that \_ does not do what i
> expected. the line is to high more like - than _.
How about something like this?:
.\" tbl
.\"
.sp 3c
.ds _ \v'.1m'\D'l 6c 0'
.vs 24
.TS
tab(|);
c c c
l l l.
Geraet
11 matches
Mail list logo
