This works fine but it is not a future proof solution :) what takes me wonder is the question what went wrong with \$_ ? and can some one make the \*_ solution more flexable so it will fill the whole column automaticly ?
(i have changed the 6c every time this works for me but may be not for others) re, wh Am 14.01.2011 11:16, schrieb Tadziu Hoffmann: > >> but it look strange when you use: >> \*_|\*_ > > Sorry, it was a bit sloppy (and worked only when \*_ was in > the last column). This is better: > > .ds _ \v'.1m'\D'l 6c 0'\v'-.1m' > > or whatever vertical offset you prefer. > > > >
