Re: [Groff] RE: List delays

2006-02-25 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> With Miklos's and Werner's messages of > > Feb 22 07:24 GMT distributed to me 18:24 GMT > Feb 22 07:28 GMT distributed to me 18:41 GMT > > the delays at lists.gnu.org are now at least 11 hours. Today it's significantly better! > Looking at the list archives at > > http://lists.gnu.org

[Groff] RE: List delays

2006-02-25 Thread Ted Harding
On 22-Feb-06 Ted Harding wrote: > It seems, looking at the headers of recent mails to > the list, that postings to the groff list are being > delayed at lists.gnu.org by 6-12 hours, typically > over 9 hours. > > Is this (as I hope) a temporary phenomenon? > > Best wishes to all, > Ted. With Mikl

Re: [Groff] RE: List delays

2006-02-25 Thread Miklos Somogyi
http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/groff/ which is spam-free (almost). Nevertheless, I continue to wonder if the incidence of spam is causing problems at lists.gnu.org; and I continue (a In the last few days I received 3 or 4 e-mails 'bout sex movies and the like. I deleted them on the spo

[Groff] RE: List delays

2006-02-23 Thread Ted Harding
On 22-Feb-06 Ted Harding wrote: > On 22-Feb-06 Ted Harding wrote: >> It seems, looking at the headers of recent mails to >> the list, that postings to the groff list are being >> delayed at lists.gnu.org by 6-12 hours, typically >> over 9 hours. >> >> Is this (as I hope) a temporary phenomenon? >