Dear Hans,
a few comments:
- Do you need to represent all four substituents around the stereogenic center?
Because so often, hydrogen if bound to carbon is implicit in the formulae,
without ambiguity. And if all four substitutents around the carbon need to
be shown -- as to introduce / tr
Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
>
> Its website "www.snake.net" does not answer to a ping call.
>
@Bjarni The most recent recording of this page by archive's waybackmachine is
by [2022-10-25 Tue].[1] At least some pages it indexes and links to are
conserved and hence still accessible. This inc
@Francesco If you want to use `groff -ms`, a MWE can be this `test.ms`
```
.\" PDF metadata
.pdfinfo /Title "example"
.pdfinfo /Author "pen paper"
.hy
.LP
This links to the start page of \c
.pdfhref W -D "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page"; -A "\c" \
-- "English Wikipedia"
\&
.pdfsync
```
Hello Marc
> groff already has perl and shell so we should stick on those choices.
>
> I saw some tests in the current codebase writen in shell but nothing
> that complies to a report system.
"Back then", after creating a local clone of groff's git repository, I
presumed the sub folder `/contrib
Hello Marc,
On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 17:06:11 +0100
Marc Chantreux wrote:
>
> I also realized I was unconfortable to touch anything without having a
> test suite so I was trying to find some existing use of dformat to make
> sure the rendering was ok.
>
Though a project of much smaller scale and l
Dear Branden
One the papers which cite the `chem` paper by Bentley, Jelinsky, Kernigham I
became aware of is "LITTLE LANGUAGES FOR PICTURES IN AWK" by Bentley. There
is a small section (around figure 7) about `chem`, too -- mirrored/rescued
for example in Arnold Robbin's public `dformat` reposito
Dear Oliver
> The Wikipedia records come with structural formulae which prompts the
> idea to use chem.pic in the groff distribution (which already has a
> handful of sctructures) along the calling convention of my little
> package yesterday. Say, \*[S:C2H5OH] would produce the structural
> formul
Dear Oliver
The idea to write `\*[H2O]` to relay the (all/most/much) of the work to
manually call subscripts in molecular formulae to an algorithm reminds me a
bit to mhchem[1] available both as a package to LaTeX[2] as well as an
extension available for posts on chemistry.stackexchange.com[3] to
