On Wed, Dec 18, 2024, Tadziu Hoffmann wrote:
>
> > Putting the motions in the diversion was how I went about it first.
> > When that didn't pan out, I went the string route, which was when I
> > discovered the diversion needed an actual glyph in it in order to
> > work as I hoped.
>
> Just out of
On Wed Dec 18, 2024 at 2:15 AM CET, onf wrote:
> On Wed Dec 18, 2024 at 12:14 AM CET, Tadziu Hoffmann wrote:
> > There are a few other words that don't follow the pattern.
> > "filtrate" is the fluid that has been filtered, but I don't
> > think "to filtrate" is a valid word. And "orientation" is
On Wed Dec 18, 2024 at 12:14 AM CET, Tadziu Hoffmann wrote:
> > With that said, not being a native speaker, if I had to turn "sequestration"
> > into a verb, I would say "sequestrate" too and it would sound right to me...
>
> There are a few other words that don't follow the pattern.
> "filtrate" i
Hi Deri,
I'm going to quote your whole presentation (omitting quotes of myself)
because it is a tour de force of explication.
At 2024-12-18T00:19:28+, Deri wrote:
> The model I use to understand the difference between \X and \!
> (.device and .output) is that one uses an in-band channel (\X)
At 2024-12-18T01:04:58+0100, Tadziu Hoffmann wrote:
> > Wrapping a diversion inside a character definition is indeed a
> > novel thing to do. At first blush, I admire the creativity.
> > At second blush, the prescriptivist and black-gloved input
> > validator in me recoils. ("Why isn't this banne
On Tuesday, 17 December 2024 17:52:50 GMT G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > The fundamental requirement for \X is that it remains in the
> > chronology of the output stream. If there is a colour change before \X
> > it needs to occur first, if there are word gaps before the \X, they
> > should be outp
> Putting the motions in the diversion was how I went about it first.
> When that didn't pan out, I went the string route, which was when I
> discovered the diversion needed an actual glyph in it in order to
> work as I hoped.
Just out of curiosity, was displaying the image the only purpose
of t
> Wrapping a diversion inside a character definition is indeed a
> novel thing to do. At first blush, I admire the creativity.
> At second blush, the prescriptivist and black-gloved input
> validator in me recoils. ("Why isn't this banned?" he roars.)
> My third reaction is as a system designer
> With that said, not being a native speaker, if I had to turn "sequestration"
> into a verb, I would say "sequestrate" too and it would sound right to me...
There are a few other words that don't follow the pattern.
"filtrate" is the fluid that has been filtered, but I don't
think "to filtrate"
Hi Branden,
On Tue Dec 17, 2024 at 8:29 PM CET, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> [...]
> (Did you hear that the Siberian traps appear to be roaring to life?[1]
> Many of us under the age of 60 can look forward to dying of heat stroke.)
Not really, but I know there are many places where the permafrost
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> One thing that itches me a little about using a diversion this way is
> that I've documented glyphs as being drawn upward and to the right from
> the text baseline. That's not happening here. So either I've
> documented the formatter wrong or you
Hi Peter,
At 2024-12-17T13:58:15-0500, Peter Schaffter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I'm glad Peter raised; now that commit has to fold. :)
>
> I almost feel guilty for opening this can of worms. :) I was looking
> for an explanation for the behaviour, which I ass
Hi onf,
At 2024-12-17T19:48:24+0100, onf wrote:
> On Tue Dec 17, 2024 at 7:00 PM CET, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Is that a standard English word? "Sequester" is; sometimes used in
> > U.S. criminal procedure to refer to a process of isolating a jury
> > during its deliberations. I think I've
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> I'm glad Peter raised; now that commit has to fold. :)
I almost feel guilty for opening this can of worms. :) I was looking
for an explanation for the behaviour, which I assumed was "correct",
my (somewhat) novel mapping of image-to-glyph with .c
On Tue Dec 17, 2024 at 7:48 PM CET, onf wrote:
> > But groff also breaks it just fine for me.
> >
> > $ hyphen sequestration
> > se‐ques‐tra‐tion
> >
> > $ cat ~/bin/hyphen
> > [...]
>
> However, I have a file where hyphentation is setup like this:
> .mso en.tmac
> .de HY
> . hy 4
> ..
>
>
Hi Branden,
On Tue Dec 17, 2024 at 7:00 PM CET, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Is that a standard English word? "Sequester" is; sometimes used in
> U.S. criminal procedure to refer to a process of isolating a jury during
> its deliberations. I think I've also seen it in fiscal contexts.
>
> "seque
Hi onf,
At 2024-12-17T18:18:39+0100, onf wrote:
> ---
> These words currently don't hyphenate at all with en.tmac.
Is that a standard English word? "Sequester" is; sometimes used in
U.S. criminal procedure to refer to a process of isolating a jury during
its deliberations. I think I've also see
At 2024-12-16T16:35:22+, Deri wrote:
> On Sunday, 15 December 2024 23:54:08 GMT G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Crudely, it _looks_ like the baseline might be getting shifted
> > upward by the vertical dimension of the image, as if placement of
> > the image-based character "knew" it needed to c
---
These words currently don't hyphenate at all with en.tmac.
tmac/hyphenex.en | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tmac/hyphenex.en b/tmac/hyphenex.en
index 768c0af9d..bd7303613 100644
--- a/tmac/hyphenex.en
+++ b/tmac/hyphenex.en
@@ -59,6 +59,10 @@
ring-leaders
round-t
19 matches
Mail list logo
