On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, Mike Skec wrote:
I was wondering if it is possible to use the "therefore" (?) and
"implies" (?) symbols using eqn.
In LaTeX this is possible using \therefore, and \implies. I can't seem
to find any method of doing this in eqn - I thought I'd ask in case I'm
missing somethin
Hello!
I was wondering if it is possible to use the "therefore" (∴) and
"implies" (⇒) symbols using eqn.
In LaTeX this is possible using \therefore, and \implies. I can't seem
to find any method of doing this in eqn - I thought I'd ask in case I'm
missing something.
Apologies if this is the wron
> > The warnings do not happen if the "else" statements are
> > wrapped in \{\ ... \} but is this supposed to be necessary?
> No. It may be sanity-preserving to use the brace escapes but
> they are not syntactically required.
I will argue that they *are* necessary. The code might appear
to
On 3/19/21 7:32 AM, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
It seems so. Would you be willing to file this report as a Savannah
ticket?
Done. https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?60260
Hi, Jim!
At 2021-03-18T16:38:07-0700, Jim Avera wrote:
> The following code operates correctly in all cases but warns about
> "unbalanced .el request" if either the first or second condition is
> true (with -w all).
>
> The warnings do not happen if the "else" statements are wrapped in \{\
> ...
Hi, Dave!
At 2021-03-19T01:42:38-0500, Dave Kemper wrote:
> Among many other changes to doc/groff.texi, commit a8f804ff
> (http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/groff.git/commit/?id=a8f804ff) does
> this:
>
> * (Sentences) Make clear that inter-sentence space is applied (if
> not zero) when
