On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, Mike Skec wrote:
I was wondering if it is possible to use the "therefore" (?) and
"implies" (?) symbols using eqn.
In LaTeX this is possible using \therefore, and \implies. I can't seem
to find any method of doing this in eqn - I thought I'd ask in case I'm
missing something.
Apologies if this is the wrong place to ask this.
Go and look in the
groff_char
manual page. They are somewhere there. I think therefor is
\[3d]
and
\[tf]
What do you mean by implies
->
or
=>
There are lots of variations of arrows. If you mean the latter then
\[rA]
You can use these in EQN directly or by defining
implies
or
therefore
as the appropriate thing.
Regards - Damian
Pacific Engineering Systems International, 277-279 Broadway, Glebe NSW 2037
Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted here
Views & opinions here are mine and not those of any past or present employer
