Re: Large curly brackets in tbl

2020-11-25 Thread Tadziu Hoffmann
> I tried to create an otherwise empty pile in eqn: Troff has the bracket-building function \b'...' which stacks the given characters atop each other, but the result is usually suboptimal, because the stack turns out to be either too big or too small (the vertical spacing is fixed, and for brace

Re: Large curly brackets in tbl

2020-11-25 Thread M Douglas McIlroy
> Let's assume I get these braces working, is there any chance to use PS to rotate them in a tbl cell without breaking everything? I've done that quite easily with PostScript from a non-groff source. The ericky part was automating it so I had to do it only once rather than once per run as the docu

Re: Large curly brackets in tbl

2020-11-25 Thread Oliver Corff
Dear All,  a follow-up after a private mail from Doug. You see my attempts to reproduce a vertical long brace similar to the example in my previous post. The output was obtained with groff -e -t ESB.tbl and -Tps, which shows rather undernourished braces in the wrong vertical position. The pd

Large curly brackets in tbl

2020-11-25 Thread Oliver Corff
Dear All, I am new to the groff mailing list; Werner suggested I try to ask here. Currently I am reproducing (typesetting) a pile of historical material which looks as if typeset with roff and the roff tool chain (tbl, eqn etc.). My trial output reproducing complex tables looks so similar to the

Re: [PATCH] mdoc: Update operating system release numbers

2020-11-25 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Larry, Larry Kollar via wrote on Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:24:44PM -0500: > Ingo Schwarze wrote: >> Somebody wrote: >>> Does Cynthia ever pop up to reflect on mdoc's design? >> Not really. With the help of Marshall Kirk McKusick, i managed to >> get into direct contact with her in 2014 ... >>

Re: Current location of fixmp?

2020-11-25 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Is there a recent version of the script 'fixmp' mentioned in the > MetaPost documentation? (It allows groff to accept MP-generated PS > files.) Sorry, no. Additionally, it seems that the current version of MetaPost (i.e., TeXLive 2020) is broken: it inserts unwanted '%' characters. > Google