Re: [Groff] License for files with »ideal« parts

2014-09-15 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Bernd, Bernd Warken wrote on Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 09:24:59PM +0200: > This is about MIT licenses for `ideal' files. These files almost certainly do not belong to the MIT. >From http://www.users.drew.edu/~cvanwyk/cvwvita.htm , my impression is that the author wasn't ever associated with the M

[Groff] License for files with »ideal« parts

2014-09-15 Thread Bernd Warken
This is about MIT licenses for `ideal' files. In `contrib/gideal/files', I stored an `ideal' document `opaque_MIT.ideal.ms', which is available as (so I changed the file name). Other documents in

Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?

2014-09-15 Thread Deri James
On Mon 15 Sep 2014 16:24:32 Ingo Schwarze wrote: > I fear that may be the wrong tool for the job. This is all about > local jumping within one single page, I have posted this link before, so apologies if you have already seen it

Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?

2014-09-15 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Hallo Ingo, Ralph, Ingo Schwarze wrote: |Ralph Corderoy wrote on Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 01:02:36PM +0100: | |> You may want to look into less's `tags' support, including the |> LESSGLOBALTAGS environment variable. | |I fear that may be the wrong tool for the job. This is all about |local ju

Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?

2014-09-15 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Hallo Ingo, Ingo Schwarze wrote: |Hi Steffen, | |Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 01:53:29PM +0200: | |> So next week (hopefully) i will sit down and write a patch against |> current -mdoc that implements an .Ix stub and documents it, adding |> an entry to the bug tracker. |

Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?

2014-09-15 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Steffen, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 01:53:29PM +0200: > So next week (hopefully) i will sit down and write a patch against > current -mdoc that implements an .Ix stub and documents it, adding > an entry to the bug tracker. Take all i'm saying below with a grain of salt; i

Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?

2014-09-15 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Ralph, Ralph Corderoy wrote on Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 01:02:36PM +0100: > You may want to look into less's `tags' support, including the > LESSGLOBALTAGS environment variable. I fear that may be the wrong tool for the job. This is all about local jumping within one single page, while global(1)

Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?

2014-09-15 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Hello Ralph, Ralph Corderoy wrote: |Without suggesting any of this is a good idea... :-) It'd be brilliant if it were 1984. Yes. |> I'd also look into less(1) and write a proof-of-concept patch. |> (Again, the idea is to have a simple command shortcut, say, ^X, read |> in a decimal number

Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?

2014-09-15 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Hallo Ingo, Ingo Schwarze wrote: |Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 05:07:27PM +0200: |> So i really like your .Ix multiplexer idea. | |Not really a multiplexer, it's just giving one single name to one |single, logically self-contained piece of functionality. Sure thing. Let

Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?

2014-09-15 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Steffen, Without suggesting any of this is a good idea... :-) > I'd also look into less(1) and write a proof-of-concept patch. > (Again, the idea is to have a simple command shortcut, say, ^X, read > in a decimal number, expand that to a backspace sequence and start a > simple search.) You m

Re: [Groff] Modified 1976 28.tbl ms document --

2014-09-15 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Carsten, > Could you post the *original* please (or a link to it)? Looks like http://www.std.com/obi/BSD/doc/usd/28.tbl/tbl Cheers, Ralph.

Re: [Groff] Modified 1976 28.tbl ms document --

2014-09-15 Thread Carsten Kunze
> Paul Townsend wrote: > I have a modified copy (the original also) of the (dated) 1976, USD 28.tbl > man(?) page written using the ms macro package. It is the only document > that I have seen that describes, with a lot of examples, the format syntax > for tbl(1). If it (or a modified/rewritten