Hello Ralph, Ralph Corderoy <ra...@inputplus.co.uk> wrote: |Without suggesting any of this is a good idea... :-)
It'd be brilliant if it were 1984. Yes. |> I'd also look into less(1) and write a proof-of-concept patch. |> (Again, the idea is to have a simple command shortcut, say, ^X, read |> in a decimal number, expand that to a backspace sequence and start a |> simple search.) | |You may want to look into less's `tags' support, including the |LESSGLOBALTAGS environment variable. Well let's see how we can get it into less(1). Maybe the tag support is a way, especially overloading [tT] for jumping along several .Ix anchor manifestations. Thanks Ralph. --steffen
