> \*[foo Blow2], with macro "foo" blank, as above, prints the entry
> correctly but refer doesn't sort it (probably something to do with
> the asterisk). It winds up at the top of the bibliography.
>
> %A \C'Blow2'\[duplicate] works reliably, so it's probably the best
> solution. The "2" is abi
> Another question/oddity. Although it isn't likely one would need
> two .R1 / .R2 blocks in the same document, in the case that one
> does, the second causes groff (or refer? I'm not sure which) to emit
> to stderr
>
> test: 12: .R1: unexpected operator
>
> unless the .R1 is followed by a bla
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010, Peter Schaffter wrote:
> The first is that refer doesn't appear to recognize named glyphs in
> a refer database, eg "Encyclop\[ae]dia Britannica" comes out as
> "Encyclop dia Britannica" and "Antoine de St-Exup\['e]ry" as
> "Antoine de St-Exup ry". Is there a solution to this
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> > The first is that refer doesn't appear to recognize named glyphs in a
> > refer database, eg "Encyclop\[ae]dia Britannica" comes out as
> > "Encyclop dia Britannica" and "Antoine de St-Exup\['e]ry" as "Antoine
> > de St-Exup ry". Is
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010, Werner Lemberg wrote:
>
> > The first is that refer doesn't appear to recognize named glyphs in
> > a refer database, eg "Encyclop\[ae]dia Britannica" comes out as
> > "Encyclop dia Britannica" and "Antoine de St-Exup\['e]ry" as
> > "Antoine de St-Exup ry". Is there a soluti
Peter:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 08:38:45PM -0400, Peter Schaffter wrote:
> Any refer experts out there? I'm overhauling mom's refer handling
> to make it fully MLA compliant, and I've encountered two issues.
>
> The first is that refer doesn't appear to recognize named glyphs in
> a refer databas
> I've made some tests. Here is a tutorial about how to use OpenType
> fonts with groff.
Thanks! I haven't tested yet your recipe, however, some comments.
> 1) OpenType font format is just an encapsulation of TrueType fonts
> or PostScript fonts.
This is a exaggerating simplification, but I th
> The first is that refer doesn't appear to recognize named glyphs in
> a refer database, eg "Encyclop\[ae]dia Britannica" comes out as
> "Encyclop dia Britannica" and "Antoine de St-Exup\['e]ry" as
> "Antoine de St-Exup ry". Is there a solution to this, or a known
> workaround?
There might be b
Hi Peter,
> The first is that refer doesn't appear to recognize named glyphs in a
> refer database, eg "Encyclop\[ae]dia Britannica" comes out as
> "Encyclop dia Britannica" and "Antoine de St-Exup\['e]ry" as "Antoine
> de St-Exup ry". Is there a solution to this, or a known workaround?
Have yo
